Table 2.

Association of candidate variants with NRM and RM

ChrGeneSNPAlleles*End pointGenomeModelMAFDiscovery resultsReplication results
PHR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)Power, %
CD274 rs10975123 C/T NRM Recipient Recessive 0.18 .00004 2.05 (1.5-2.8) .46 0.84 (0.5-1.4) 39 
CD274 rs10975123 C/T NRM Recipient Allelic 0.18 .0008 1.24 (1.1-1.4) .99 1.00 (0.9-1.2) 100 
HLA-DOA rs429916 C/A NRM Recipient Recessive 0.07 .004 2.91 (1.6-5.4) .19 0.34 (0.05-2.4) 
MICA rs1051792 G/A NRM Donor Allelic 0.27 .002 0.84 (0.8-0.9) .02 0.85 (0.7-1.0) 100 
IL12B rs3212227 T/G NRM Donor Recessive 0.21 .005 0.56 (0.4-0.9) .39 1.21 (0.8-1.8) 48 
CCR5 rs1800023 A/G RM Donor Dominant 0.36 .002 1.29 (1.1-1.5) .14 1.16 (1.0-1.4) 100 
ChrGeneSNPAlleles*End pointGenomeModelMAFDiscovery resultsReplication results
PHR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)Power, %
CD274 rs10975123 C/T NRM Recipient Recessive 0.18 .00004 2.05 (1.5-2.8) .46 0.84 (0.5-1.4) 39 
CD274 rs10975123 C/T NRM Recipient Allelic 0.18 .0008 1.24 (1.1-1.4) .99 1.00 (0.9-1.2) 100 
HLA-DOA rs429916 C/A NRM Recipient Recessive 0.07 .004 2.91 (1.6-5.4) .19 0.34 (0.05-2.4) 
MICA rs1051792 G/A NRM Donor Allelic 0.27 .002 0.84 (0.8-0.9) .02 0.85 (0.7-1.0) 100 
IL12B rs3212227 T/G NRM Donor Recessive 0.21 .005 0.56 (0.4-0.9) .39 1.21 (0.8-1.8) 48 
CCR5 rs1800023 A/G RM Donor Dominant 0.36 .002 1.29 (1.1-1.5) .14 1.16 (1.0-1.4) 100 

Chr, chromosome; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

*

Plus strand major/minor alleles.

MAF in the samples used for the test.

Post hoc power estimates to detect an HR ≥1.5 or ≤0.67 at a 2-sided significance level of .05 were based on the estimated standard error of the log HR in the replication cohort.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal