Multinomial logistic regression analysis of association of sex, age at diagnosis, and MPN-specific mutation with presenting phenotype ET vs PMF
| Variable . | ET vs PMF . | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| RR . | 95% CI . | P . | |
| Male sex | 3.2 | 2.12-4.93 | <.001 |
| Age at diagnosis, y | 1.05 | 1.04-1.07 | <.001 |
| MPN-specific mutation | |||
| JAK2+ | Ref | ||
| CALR+ | 1.05 | 0.63-1.76 | .855 |
| MPL+ | 0.79 | 0.26-2.43 | .686 |
| Triple-negative | 2.16 | 0.99-4.76 | .051 |
| JAK2– others not done | 1.09 | 0.27-4.39 | .760 |
| Variable . | ET vs PMF . | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| RR . | 95% CI . | P . | |
| Male sex | 3.2 | 2.12-4.93 | <.001 |
| Age at diagnosis, y | 1.05 | 1.04-1.07 | <.001 |
| MPN-specific mutation | |||
| JAK2+ | Ref | ||
| CALR+ | 1.05 | 0.63-1.76 | .855 |
| MPL+ | 0.79 | 0.26-2.43 | .686 |
| Triple-negative | 2.16 | 0.99-4.76 | .051 |
| JAK2– others not done | 1.09 | 0.27-4.39 | .760 |