Table 1.

Histologic Subtype and Immunophenotype: Description of the Patients, Outcome, Prognostic Value of Histologic Typing, and Immunophenotyping

Characteristics MDPatients OutcomeUnivariate Analysis P*Multivariate Analysis P
No. of Patients % No. of Events 3-yr EFS
All   82  25  66% [54-76%]  
Histologic subtype      .02 .35 
 Common type   48 65%  12  73% [58-85%]  
 Lympho-histiocytic (LH)  13  17%  8  16% [3-53%]  
  Pure LH  7  9%  
  Common plus LH   6  8%  
 Other  13  17%  3  76% [48-91%]  
  Small-cell variant   5  7%  
  Common plus small cell   8%  
  Giant-cell variant   1  1%  
  Mixed (other)   1  1%  
Immunophenotype  
 T/null/B phenotype 12      .11  .27  
  T   61  87% 16  70% [56-81%]  
  Null   9  13%  44% [19-73%]  
  B   0  0%  — 
 CD30  0  82  100%  
 EMA  0  82  100% 
 ALK-1  2  74  93%  24  64% [52-75%]  .32 —  
 BNH9  4  61  78%  19 66% [52-77%]  .66  — 
Characteristics MDPatients OutcomeUnivariate Analysis P*Multivariate Analysis P
No. of Patients % No. of Events 3-yr EFS
All   82  25  66% [54-76%]  
Histologic subtype      .02 .35 
 Common type   48 65%  12  73% [58-85%]  
 Lympho-histiocytic (LH)  13  17%  8  16% [3-53%]  
  Pure LH  7  9%  
  Common plus LH   6  8%  
 Other  13  17%  3  76% [48-91%]  
  Small-cell variant   5  7%  
  Common plus small cell   8%  
  Giant-cell variant   1  1%  
  Mixed (other)   1  1%  
Immunophenotype  
 T/null/B phenotype 12      .11  .27  
  T   61  87% 16  70% [56-81%]  
  Null   9  13%  44% [19-73%]  
  B   0  0%  — 
 CD30  0  82  100%  
 EMA  0  82  100% 
 ALK-1  2  74  93%  24  64% [52-75%]  .32 —  
 BNH9  4  61  78%  19 66% [52-77%]  .66  — 

Under patients, the number of patients in the subsets is given. Under outcome, the number of events in the subsets is given. For the variables defining two subgroups, only the data concerning the group with the poorer outcome have been given. The number of events in the complementary group can be deducted by subtraction.

Abbreviation: MD, number of missing data for the variable.

*

P value of the two-tailed logrank test comparing each subset with the complementary group, adjusted on the chemotherapy protocol (univariate analysis).

P value in the multivariate analysis, adjusted on the chemotherapy regimen.

Because EFS of the common type overlaps with that of the so-called others, these two groups have been pooled, to conduct a comparison between lympho-histiocytic (pure or mixed) and non–lympho-histiocytic (P = .02). This binary variable has been tested in the Cox model.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal