Table 9.

Cytogenetic classification for risk grouping in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).*

Cytogenetic AbnormalityFrequen cy in ChildrenFrequency in AdultsFusion GenesGenetic and Biologic Modifiers of Outcome
Others: 20q, 21q, del (9q), t(9;22), abn 17p, complex karyotypes (≥ 3) 
*Adapted from References 1, 2, 11, 24. 
It should be noted that this classification scheme is that used by the US Cooperative Groups.24 The MRC11 uses an altered classification scheme in which abn11q23, del(9), del(7q) without other abnormalities and complex abn ≥ 3 but ≤ 5 are considered “intermediate” risk, not “unfavorable” as shown in this table. Awareness of these differences in cytogenetic risk grouping is critical for comparison of outcome on clinical trials conducted by these groups. 
“Favorable” Cytogenetics     
t(8;21)(q22;q22) 12% 5-8% (< 55 yrs), Rare (> 55 yrs) AML1/ETO FLT3 ITD (9%) + del(9q), + Complex 
Inv(16)(p13q22) 12% 10% (< 45 yrs), Rare (> 45 yrs) CBFβ/MYH11 FLT3 ITD (7%) 
t(16;16)(p13;q22)     
t(15;17)(q21;q11) 7% 15% (< 45 years), Rare (> 45 years) PML-RARα FLT3 ITD (37%) 
Variants:     
t(11;17)(q23;q11)   PLZF-RARα  
t(5;17)(q32;q11)   NPM-RARα  
t(11;17)(q13;q11)   NuMA-RARα  
“Intermediate” Cytogenetics     
+8 Rare 10%  FLT3 ITD (28%) 
Normal karyotype 10-15% 15-20%  FLT3 ITD (34%) 
    MLL ITD (10%) 
Others: Y, +6, All other karyotypes not considered favorable or unfavorable    FLT3 ITD (20-30%) 
“Unfavorable” Cytogenetics     
Abn 11q23 > 50% of infant AML cases 7% t(9;11) 5-7% MLL FLT3 ITD (0%) 
Common Variants:     
t(4;11)(q21;q23)   MLL/AF4  
t(9;11)(p22;q23)   MLL/AF9  
t(11;19)(q23;p13.1)   MLL/ELL  
t(11;19)(q23;p13.3)   MLL/ENL  
t(6;9)(p23;q34) Rare <1% DEK/CAN Inv(3)(q21q26), 
t(3;3)(q21;q26) 3% 3-5% Ribophorin/EVI1 FLT3 ITD (17%) 
–5/del(5q) Rare <10% (< 45 yrs) >10% (> 45 yrs)  MDR drug resistance FLT3 ITD (0%) 
–7/del(7q) 10% <10% (< 45 yrs) >10% (> 45 yrs)  MDR drug resistance FLT3 ITD (7%) 
Cytogenetic AbnormalityFrequen cy in ChildrenFrequency in AdultsFusion GenesGenetic and Biologic Modifiers of Outcome
Others: 20q, 21q, del (9q), t(9;22), abn 17p, complex karyotypes (≥ 3) 
*Adapted from References 1, 2, 11, 24. 
It should be noted that this classification scheme is that used by the US Cooperative Groups.24 The MRC11 uses an altered classification scheme in which abn11q23, del(9), del(7q) without other abnormalities and complex abn ≥ 3 but ≤ 5 are considered “intermediate” risk, not “unfavorable” as shown in this table. Awareness of these differences in cytogenetic risk grouping is critical for comparison of outcome on clinical trials conducted by these groups. 
“Favorable” Cytogenetics     
t(8;21)(q22;q22) 12% 5-8% (< 55 yrs), Rare (> 55 yrs) AML1/ETO FLT3 ITD (9%) + del(9q), + Complex 
Inv(16)(p13q22) 12% 10% (< 45 yrs), Rare (> 45 yrs) CBFβ/MYH11 FLT3 ITD (7%) 
t(16;16)(p13;q22)     
t(15;17)(q21;q11) 7% 15% (< 45 years), Rare (> 45 years) PML-RARα FLT3 ITD (37%) 
Variants:     
t(11;17)(q23;q11)   PLZF-RARα  
t(5;17)(q32;q11)   NPM-RARα  
t(11;17)(q13;q11)   NuMA-RARα  
“Intermediate” Cytogenetics     
+8 Rare 10%  FLT3 ITD (28%) 
Normal karyotype 10-15% 15-20%  FLT3 ITD (34%) 
    MLL ITD (10%) 
Others: Y, +6, All other karyotypes not considered favorable or unfavorable    FLT3 ITD (20-30%) 
“Unfavorable” Cytogenetics     
Abn 11q23 > 50% of infant AML cases 7% t(9;11) 5-7% MLL FLT3 ITD (0%) 
Common Variants:     
t(4;11)(q21;q23)   MLL/AF4  
t(9;11)(p22;q23)   MLL/AF9  
t(11;19)(q23;p13.1)   MLL/ELL  
t(11;19)(q23;p13.3)   MLL/ENL  
t(6;9)(p23;q34) Rare <1% DEK/CAN Inv(3)(q21q26), 
t(3;3)(q21;q26) 3% 3-5% Ribophorin/EVI1 FLT3 ITD (17%) 
–5/del(5q) Rare <10% (< 45 yrs) >10% (> 45 yrs)  MDR drug resistance FLT3 ITD (0%) 
–7/del(7q) 10% <10% (< 45 yrs) >10% (> 45 yrs)  MDR drug resistance FLT3 ITD (7%) 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal