Table 9.

Results of the main studies of interferon-α (IFN-α) alone or in combination with low dose cytosine arabinoside (LDAC).The studies are ordered by year of publication. Notice that the dose of IFN-α is the dose that was scheduled. The dose that was actually given ranged from less than 50% to 80% of scheduled. In the study of Schofield et al30 IFN-α was scheduled daily for the first month and three times a week thereafter. In the Benelux study38 IFN-α was scheduled five times a week.

IFN-α dose (MIU/day)No. of casesMajor cytogenetic response*5-year survival
* Major cytogenetic response = Ph neg metaphases 66-100%. 
1 Multicenter non-randomized study 
2 Single center randomized study of IFN-α versus conventional chemotherapy. 
3 Multicenter non-randomized study 
4 Multicenter randomized study of IFN-α versus IFN-α + LDAC. 
Abbreviations: ICSG, Italian Cooperative Study Group 
Ozer et al 1993 IFN-α 1 5/m2 128 24% 52% 
ICSG on CML 1994 IFN-α 2 5/m2 218 19% 60% 
Schofield et al 1994 IFN-α 3 2/m2 41 17% 62% 
Hehlmann et al 1994 IFN-α 2 5/m2 133 6% 58% 
Kantarjian et al 1995 IFN-α 3 5/m2 274 38% 62% 
Allan et al 1995 IFN-α 2 5/m2 293 10% 50% 
Ohnishi et al 1995 IFN-α 2 5/m2 85 15% 63% 
Thaler et al 1996 IFN-α 1 3.5 total 80 12% 50% 
Guilhot et al 1997 IFN-α 4 5/m2 361 21% 62% 
Guilhot et al 1997 IFN-α+LDAC4 5/m2 360 35% 70% 
Benelux 1998 IFN-α 2 3 total 100 16% 54% 
Mahon et al 1998 IFN-α 3 5/m2 116 43% 68% 
Kantarjian et al 1999 IFN-α+LDAC3 5/m2 186 45% 68% 
ICSG on CML 1999 IFN-α1 5/m2 272 22% 63% 
Lindauer et al 1999 IFN-α+LDAC1 5 total 65 11% 56% 
Kloke et al 2000 IFN-α3 4/m2 71 30% 60% 
ICSG on CML 2001 IFN-α4 5/m2 263 18% 65% 
ICSG on CML 2001 IFN-α+LDAC4 5/m2 275 28% 68% 
IFN-α dose (MIU/day)No. of casesMajor cytogenetic response*5-year survival
* Major cytogenetic response = Ph neg metaphases 66-100%. 
1 Multicenter non-randomized study 
2 Single center randomized study of IFN-α versus conventional chemotherapy. 
3 Multicenter non-randomized study 
4 Multicenter randomized study of IFN-α versus IFN-α + LDAC. 
Abbreviations: ICSG, Italian Cooperative Study Group 
Ozer et al 1993 IFN-α 1 5/m2 128 24% 52% 
ICSG on CML 1994 IFN-α 2 5/m2 218 19% 60% 
Schofield et al 1994 IFN-α 3 2/m2 41 17% 62% 
Hehlmann et al 1994 IFN-α 2 5/m2 133 6% 58% 
Kantarjian et al 1995 IFN-α 3 5/m2 274 38% 62% 
Allan et al 1995 IFN-α 2 5/m2 293 10% 50% 
Ohnishi et al 1995 IFN-α 2 5/m2 85 15% 63% 
Thaler et al 1996 IFN-α 1 3.5 total 80 12% 50% 
Guilhot et al 1997 IFN-α 4 5/m2 361 21% 62% 
Guilhot et al 1997 IFN-α+LDAC4 5/m2 360 35% 70% 
Benelux 1998 IFN-α 2 3 total 100 16% 54% 
Mahon et al 1998 IFN-α 3 5/m2 116 43% 68% 
Kantarjian et al 1999 IFN-α+LDAC3 5/m2 186 45% 68% 
ICSG on CML 1999 IFN-α1 5/m2 272 22% 63% 
Lindauer et al 1999 IFN-α+LDAC1 5 total 65 11% 56% 
Kloke et al 2000 IFN-α3 4/m2 71 30% 60% 
ICSG on CML 2001 IFN-α4 5/m2 263 18% 65% 
ICSG on CML 2001 IFN-α+LDAC4 5/m2 275 28% 68% 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal