Table 3.

Results of induction therapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia according to cytogenetic prognostic groups.

FavorableIntermediateUnfavorable
nCRnCRnCR
Results of induction therapy from 3 cooperative groups. Identical standard induction therapy was used in all cytogenetic subtypes. A remarkable concordance among the 3 groups is demonstrated, although a rigorous comparison cannot be made due to minor differences among the studies in the classification of the cytogenetic prognostic groups. 
Abbreviations: MRC, Medical Research Council; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; SWOG, Southwestern Oncology Group; GOELAM, Groupe Ouest-Est Leukemies Aigues Myeloblastiques 
MRC2(excluding children) 289 90% 853 84% 130 57% 
ECOG/SWOG27 121 84% 278 76% 184 55% 
GOELAM24 48 87% 226 76% 36 58% 
FavorableIntermediateUnfavorable
nCRnCRnCR
Results of induction therapy from 3 cooperative groups. Identical standard induction therapy was used in all cytogenetic subtypes. A remarkable concordance among the 3 groups is demonstrated, although a rigorous comparison cannot be made due to minor differences among the studies in the classification of the cytogenetic prognostic groups. 
Abbreviations: MRC, Medical Research Council; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; SWOG, Southwestern Oncology Group; GOELAM, Groupe Ouest-Est Leukemies Aigues Myeloblastiques 
MRC2(excluding children) 289 90% 853 84% 130 57% 
ECOG/SWOG27 121 84% 278 76% 184 55% 
GOELAM24 48 87% 226 76% 36 58% 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal