Table 2.

Effect of RA on the expression of t-PA, RARα, RARβ, RARγ, and Sp1 mRNA over time



Treatment-to-control ratios, mean (SEM)


0 h
2 h
4 h
6 h
8 h
ANOVA
t-PA   1.0   1.3 (0.08)   1.6 (0.22)*  1.8 (0.23)  2.0 (0.14)  < .01  
RARα   1.0   1.2 (0.07)*  0.9 (0.11)   0.9 (0.05)   0.8 (0.03)   < .01  
RARβ   1.0   4.1 (1.68)*  4.7 (1.28)  5.5 (1.58)  5.6 (1.27)  < .01  
RARγ   1.0   1.2 (0.07)   1.6 (0.13)  1.4 (0.03)  1.4 (0.06)  < .01  
Sp1
 
1.0
 
1.0 (0.09)
 
1.0 (0.02)
 
1.1 (0.03)
 
1.0 (0.01)
 
NS
 


Treatment-to-control ratios, mean (SEM)


0 h
2 h
4 h
6 h
8 h
ANOVA
t-PA   1.0   1.3 (0.08)   1.6 (0.22)*  1.8 (0.23)  2.0 (0.14)  < .01  
RARα   1.0   1.2 (0.07)*  0.9 (0.11)   0.9 (0.05)   0.8 (0.03)   < .01  
RARβ   1.0   4.1 (1.68)*  4.7 (1.28)  5.5 (1.58)  5.6 (1.27)  < .01  
RARγ   1.0   1.2 (0.07)   1.6 (0.13)  1.4 (0.03)  1.4 (0.06)  < .01  
Sp1
 
1.0
 
1.0 (0.09)
 
1.0 (0.02)
 
1.1 (0.03)
 
1.0 (0.01)
 
NS
 

n = 3. Confluent HUVEC cultures in the second passage were incubated for the indicated time periods with 10-6 M RA or DMSO vehicle (0.01%). Total cellular RNA was extracted, and mRNA was converted into cDNA. Target mRNA (cDNA) was quantified by real-time PCR and normalized relative to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphatedehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA. The results are expressed as fold induction compared with control cultures. Each data point represents the average of duplicate wells from 3 different HUVEC cultures, each assayed in triplicate for both target and GAPDH. Post hoc analysis was performed by contrast analysis. NS indicates not significant.

*

P < .05.

P < .01.

P < .001.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal