Table 1.

Clinical and laboratory features of 91 patients with MMM who underwent LT


Patient characteristics

Data
Sex, no. (%)  
    Male   55 (60)  
    Female   36 (40)  
Median age, y (range)  
    At diagnosis of MMM   63 (21-81)  
    At time of LT   66 (41-82)  
Type of MMM, no. (%)  
    Agnogenic myeloid metaplasia   49 (54)  
    Postpolycythemic myeloid metaplasia   22 (24)  
    Postthrombocythemic myeloid metaplasia   20 (22)  
Lille10 prognostic score at diagnosis of MMM, available in 48 patients, no. (%)  
    0   26 (54)  
    1   18 (38)  
    2   4 (8)  
Circulating blasts present at time of MMM diagnosis, available in 48 patients, no. (%)   23 (48)  
Median interval between diagnosis of MMM and LT, mos (range)   31 (2-441)  
Prior treatment for MMM, no. (%)  
    Hydroxyurea   47 (52)  
    Splenectomy   33 (36)  
    Radioactive phosphorus, P32  12 (13)  
    Alkylators such as busulfan, cyclophosphamide, etc
 
12 (13)
 

Patient characteristics

Data
Sex, no. (%)  
    Male   55 (60)  
    Female   36 (40)  
Median age, y (range)  
    At diagnosis of MMM   63 (21-81)  
    At time of LT   66 (41-82)  
Type of MMM, no. (%)  
    Agnogenic myeloid metaplasia   49 (54)  
    Postpolycythemic myeloid metaplasia   22 (24)  
    Postthrombocythemic myeloid metaplasia   20 (22)  
Lille10 prognostic score at diagnosis of MMM, available in 48 patients, no. (%)  
    0   26 (54)  
    1   18 (38)  
    2   4 (8)  
Circulating blasts present at time of MMM diagnosis, available in 48 patients, no. (%)   23 (48)  
Median interval between diagnosis of MMM and LT, mos (range)   31 (2-441)  
Prior treatment for MMM, no. (%)  
    Hydroxyurea   47 (52)  
    Splenectomy   33 (36)  
    Radioactive phosphorus, P32  12 (13)  
    Alkylators such as busulfan, cyclophosphamide, etc
 
12 (13)
 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal