Table 2.

Summary of antifolate resistance parameters in 7-OHMTX–resistant and MTX-resistant CCRF-CEM and MOLT-4 cells compared with their parental cells


Cell line

RFC-mediated transport*(fold change)

FPGS activity(fold change)

FPGH activity(fold change)

TS activity§(fold change)
CCRF-CEM/MTX   ↓ ↓ (13)   ↑ (1.3)   No change   ↑ (1.7)  
CCRF-CEM/7-OHMTX   ↓ (1.4)   ↓ ↓ (56)   ↑ (1.7)   No change  
MOLT-4/MTX   ↓ ↓ (11)   ↑ (1.5)   No change   ↑ (2.4)  
MOLT-4/7-OHMTX
 
No change
 
↓ ↓ (92)
 
No change
 
No change
 

Cell line

RFC-mediated transport*(fold change)

FPGS activity(fold change)

FPGH activity(fold change)

TS activity§(fold change)
CCRF-CEM/MTX   ↓ ↓ (13)   ↑ (1.3)   No change   ↑ (1.7)  
CCRF-CEM/7-OHMTX   ↓ (1.4)   ↓ ↓ (56)   ↑ (1.7)   No change  
MOLT-4/MTX   ↓ ↓ (11)   ↑ (1.5)   No change   ↑ (2.4)  
MOLT-4/7-OHMTX
 
No change
 
↓ ↓ (92)
 
No change
 
No change
 

MRP1 through MRP4 mRNA and protein levels were assayed by RT-PCR and Western blotting; no change was observed in any cell line.

*

RFC transport is depicted as [3H]MTX influx rates at an extracellular concentration of 1 μM [3H]MTX. Control values for parental CCRF-CEM and MOLT-4 cells were 0.87 ± 0.13 pmol [3H]-MTX/min/107 cells and 0.34 ± 0.05 [3H]-MTX/min/107 cells, respectively

FPGS activity was determined at substrate concentrations of 250 μM MTX and 4 mM [3H]-L-glutamic acid. Control values for parental CCRF-CEM and Molt-4 cells were 958 ± 478 and 739 ± 171 pmol [3H]-glutamate incorporated/h/mg protein, respectively

FPGH activity was determined at substrate concentration of 100 μM MTX-Glu2. Control values for parental CCRF-CEM and MOLT-4 cells were 8460 ± 374 and 2658 ± 42 pmol MTX-Glu2 breakdown/h/mg protein, respectively

§

TS activity was measured either in cell extracts or in intact cells in situ. Control values for parental CCRF-CEM and Molt-4 cells were 4.8 ± 0.23 and 2.7 ± 0.24 nmol/h/mg protein, respectively

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal