Table 3.

Prognostic value of cytogenetics in the population of 405 patients with available karyotype


Cytogenetic subgroup*

Favorable

Intermediate

Unfavorable

Unknown significance

P
Patients, no.   56   215   80   54   —  
CR, no. (%)   53 (95)   173 (80)   45 (56)   41 (76)   < .0001  
Cumulative incidence of relapse      .20  
2-year estimate, % (95% Cl)   49.0 (35.4-62.7)   44.5 (37.1-51.9)   60 (45.2-74.8)   56.1 (40.5-71.7)   —  
5-year estimate, % (95% Cl)
 
49.0 (35.4-62.7)
 
55.5 (48.1-63.0)
 
64.4 (49.8-79.1)
 
63.4 (48.2-78.7)
 

 

Cytogenetic subgroup*

Favorable

Intermediate

Unfavorable

Unknown significance

P
Patients, no.   56   215   80   54   —  
CR, no. (%)   53 (95)   173 (80)   45 (56)   41 (76)   < .0001  
Cumulative incidence of relapse      .20  
2-year estimate, % (95% Cl)   49.0 (35.4-62.7)   44.5 (37.1-51.9)   60 (45.2-74.8)   56.1 (40.5-71.7)   —  
5-year estimate, % (95% Cl)
 
49.0 (35.4-62.7)
 
55.5 (48.1-63.0)
 
64.4 (49.8-79.1)
 
63.4 (48.2-78.7)
 

 
*

According to the SWOG/ECOG classification.23 

Using the Gray test with allogeneic BMT in first CR and death in first CR considered as competing events. The P value was .28 when the favorable subgroup was compared to the nonfavorable subgroups and .09 when the unfavorable group was compared to the nonunfavorable subgroups.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal