Comparison of IC50 and PF50 values derived from the growth inhibition curves
Drug . | Drug alone IC50, nM* . | Drug + NU7026 IC50, nM* . | PF50† . |
---|---|---|---|
mAMSA | 32 | 1.6 | 19.2 ± 7.5 |
Mitoxantrone | 3 | 0.18 | 16.6 ± 6.6 |
Etoposide | 317 | 45 | 8.6 ± 1.0 |
Doxorubicin | 45 | 10 | 4.0 ± 0.38 |
Daunorubicin | 205 | 78 | 2.6 ± 0.11 |
Idarubicin | 9.5 | 5.4 | 1.7 ± 0.17 |
Camptothecin | 6.8 | 7.3 | 0.88 ± 0.17 |
araC | 33 | 66 | 0.45 ± 0.29 |
Drug . | Drug alone IC50, nM* . | Drug + NU7026 IC50, nM* . | PF50† . |
---|---|---|---|
mAMSA | 32 | 1.6 | 19.2 ± 7.5 |
Mitoxantrone | 3 | 0.18 | 16.6 ± 6.6 |
Etoposide | 317 | 45 | 8.6 ± 1.0 |
Doxorubicin | 45 | 10 | 4.0 ± 0.38 |
Daunorubicin | 205 | 78 | 2.6 ± 0.11 |
Idarubicin | 9.5 | 5.4 | 1.7 ± 0.17 |
Camptothecin | 6.8 | 7.3 | 0.88 ± 0.17 |
araC | 33 | 66 | 0.45 ± 0.29 |
IC50 values are the means of at least 3 independent experiments.
All mean PF50 values (± SE) were calculated from the ratio of the individual IC50 values (eg, the concentration of drug that caused 50% growth inhibition divided by the concentration of drug that caused 50% growth inhibition in the presence of NU7026).