Table 2.

Spontaneous chromosome breakage and rearrangement




Chromatid gaps and breaks/cell

Rearrangements/cell

Total aberrations/cell

% cells with aberrations
Kindred 1-sibling 1, skin   1.18   0.98   2.16   94* 
Kindred 1-sibling 2     
   Blood   0.78   0.10   0.88   46* 
   Skin   0.98   0.40   1.38   68* 
Kindred 2-sibling 2     
   Blood   0.24   0.24   0.48   40* 
   Skin   0.20   0.28   0.48   44* 
Healthy controls, blood   0.024   0.004   0.025   3.59  
FA controls, blood
 
0.254
 
0.016
 
0.269
 
23.1
 



Chromatid gaps and breaks/cell

Rearrangements/cell

Total aberrations/cell

% cells with aberrations
Kindred 1-sibling 1, skin   1.18   0.98   2.16   94* 
Kindred 1-sibling 2     
   Blood   0.78   0.10   0.88   46* 
   Skin   0.98   0.40   1.38   68* 
Kindred 2-sibling 2     
   Blood   0.24   0.24   0.48   40* 
   Skin   0.20   0.28   0.48   44* 
Healthy controls, blood   0.024   0.004   0.025   3.59  
FA controls, blood
 
0.254
 
0.016
 
0.269
 
23.1
 

Chromosome abnormalities were evaluated for the 3 indicated patients. For each sample, 50 G-banded metaphases were analyzed. Breaks and rearrangements were also scored for a control series of 28 DEB-confirmed FA patients and a series of 27 non-FA individuals. The subtype of these control FA patients was unknown. However, because FA-D1 is a rare subtype, accounting for less than 5% of all FA patients, few if any of these control FA patients are likely to be from subtype D1. Rearrangements included balanced translocations, derivative chromosomes, inversions, dicentrics, and rings.

*

For each of the 3 patients tested, the percentage of cells with aberrations fell above the upper limit of the 95% Cl for the 28 FA controls and the 27 healthy controls

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal