Table 3.

Univariable analyses of LFS after UCBT for childhood AML




Two-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of LFS, %*

P, log-rank test
Overall   42 ± 5   
Diagnosis, de novo vs secondary AML   40 ± 6 vs 56 ± 16   .54  
WBC count at diagnosis, less than or equal to 50 × 109/L vs greater than 50 × 109/L   43 ± 7 vs 41 ± 10   .67  
Cytogenetics, “poor-risk” karyotype vs others   44 ± 11 vs 40 ± 8   .62  
Age at UCBT, younger than 6 y vs 6 y or older   44 ± 7 vs 39 ± 6   .67  
Recipient's sex, male vs female   48 ± 7 vs 36 ± 7   .35  
Recipient's weight at UCBT, less than 21 kg vs 21 kg or more   42 ± 6 vs 42 ± 7   .96  
Recipient's CMV serology prior to UCBT, negative vs positive   37 ± 7 vs 48 ± 7   .09  
Status at UCBT    .002†  
CR1   59 ± 11   
CR2   50 ± 8   
Subsequent CR   0   
No CR   21 ± 9   
Previous transplantation, no vs yes   38 ± 6 vs 54 ± 11   .10  
Graft/recipient HLA compatibility (high-resolution typing)    .22  
HLA identical   19 ± 15   
1 HLA disparity   45 ± 8   
2 HLA disparities   37 ± 9   
3 or more HLA disparities   56 ± 17   
ABO compatibility, matched vs minor vs major mismatched   51 ± 8 vs 42 ± 12 vs 28 ± 9   .05  
Collected nucleated cell dose, less than 5.2 × 107/kg vs 5.2 × 107/kg or more   38 ± 7 vs 46 ± 8   .46  
Infused nucleated cell dose, less than 4.4 × 107/kg vs 4.4 × 107/kg or more   36 ± 7 vs 50 ± 8   .25  
Infused CD34+ cell dose, less than 1.38 × 105/kg vs 1.38 × 105/kg or more   34 ± 9 vs 52 ± 10   .35  
UCBT date, before January 1998 vs after January 1998   30 ± 9 vs 46 ± 6   .04  
Conditioning regimen, Bu-containing vs TBI-containing   33 ± 7 vs 53 ± 8   .10  
Posttransplantation growth factor, no vs yes   35 ± 8 vs 48 ± 7   .23  
Use of MTX for GVHD prophylaxis, no vs yes
 
41 ± 7 vs 41 ± 10
 
.67
 



Two-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of LFS, %*

P, log-rank test
Overall   42 ± 5   
Diagnosis, de novo vs secondary AML   40 ± 6 vs 56 ± 16   .54  
WBC count at diagnosis, less than or equal to 50 × 109/L vs greater than 50 × 109/L   43 ± 7 vs 41 ± 10   .67  
Cytogenetics, “poor-risk” karyotype vs others   44 ± 11 vs 40 ± 8   .62  
Age at UCBT, younger than 6 y vs 6 y or older   44 ± 7 vs 39 ± 6   .67  
Recipient's sex, male vs female   48 ± 7 vs 36 ± 7   .35  
Recipient's weight at UCBT, less than 21 kg vs 21 kg or more   42 ± 6 vs 42 ± 7   .96  
Recipient's CMV serology prior to UCBT, negative vs positive   37 ± 7 vs 48 ± 7   .09  
Status at UCBT    .002†  
CR1   59 ± 11   
CR2   50 ± 8   
Subsequent CR   0   
No CR   21 ± 9   
Previous transplantation, no vs yes   38 ± 6 vs 54 ± 11   .10  
Graft/recipient HLA compatibility (high-resolution typing)    .22  
HLA identical   19 ± 15   
1 HLA disparity   45 ± 8   
2 HLA disparities   37 ± 9   
3 or more HLA disparities   56 ± 17   
ABO compatibility, matched vs minor vs major mismatched   51 ± 8 vs 42 ± 12 vs 28 ± 9   .05  
Collected nucleated cell dose, less than 5.2 × 107/kg vs 5.2 × 107/kg or more   38 ± 7 vs 46 ± 8   .46  
Infused nucleated cell dose, less than 4.4 × 107/kg vs 4.4 × 107/kg or more   36 ± 7 vs 50 ± 8   .25  
Infused CD34+ cell dose, less than 1.38 × 105/kg vs 1.38 × 105/kg or more   34 ± 9 vs 52 ± 10   .35  
UCBT date, before January 1998 vs after January 1998   30 ± 9 vs 46 ± 6   .04  
Conditioning regimen, Bu-containing vs TBI-containing   33 ± 7 vs 53 ± 8   .10  
Posttransplantation growth factor, no vs yes   35 ± 8 vs 48 ± 7   .23  
Use of MTX for GVHD prophylaxis, no vs yes
 
41 ± 7 vs 41 ± 10
 
.67
 

WBC indicates white blood cell; CMV, cytomegalovirus; TBI, total body irradiation; Bu, Busulfan; and MTX, methotrexate.

*

Values given as percentage ± SD.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal