Table 1.

Characteristics of the HSCT cohort according to transplant type


Variable

Myeloablative

Nonmyeloablative
No. of patients   197   67  
Median age, y (range)   42 (18-62)   52 (21-66)  
Male, %   58.4   62.7  
HLA matching, %*   
    Matched-related   50.8   46.3  
    Matched-unrelated   30.9   49.2  
    Mismatched-related   5.1   3.0  
    Mismatched-unrelated   13.2   1.5  
Stem cell source, %   
    Bone marrow   82.2   3.0  
    Peripheral   17.8   97.0  
Conditioning regimen, %   
    Cyclophosphamide   100   0  
    TBI   94.9   0  
    ATG   1.5   0  
    Busulfan   3.6   100  
    Fludarabine   0   100  
Diagnosis, %   
    AML   31.0   28.4  
    CML   18.3   11.9  
    MDS   15.2   13.4  
    NHL   9.6   19.4  
    ALL   14.7   3.0  
    CLL   2.0   11.9  
    Other   9.1   11.9  
Risk group, %   
    Low   36.6   11.9  
    High   63.4   88.1  
CMV serology of donor/recipient, %   
    D-/R-  48.2   39.7  
    D-/R+  13.7   22.4  
    D+/R-  19.3   25.9  
    D+/R+  18.8   12.1  
GVHD prophylaxis, %§   
    Methotrexate   72.1   0  
    Cyclosporine   27.4   100  
    Tacrolimus   54.3   0  
    Sirolimus   21.8   0  
    MMF   1.0   16.4  
    T-cell manipulation  22.8   6.0  
    Corticosteroids   18.8   94.0  
Total patient-days   64 759   18 485  
Median follow-up, d (IQR)   255 (102-527)   250 (181-341)  
Median survival, d (95% CI)
 
468 (257-871 +)
 
341 (249-503)
 

Variable

Myeloablative

Nonmyeloablative
No. of patients   197   67  
Median age, y (range)   42 (18-62)   52 (21-66)  
Male, %   58.4   62.7  
HLA matching, %*   
    Matched-related   50.8   46.3  
    Matched-unrelated   30.9   49.2  
    Mismatched-related   5.1   3.0  
    Mismatched-unrelated   13.2   1.5  
Stem cell source, %   
    Bone marrow   82.2   3.0  
    Peripheral   17.8   97.0  
Conditioning regimen, %   
    Cyclophosphamide   100   0  
    TBI   94.9   0  
    ATG   1.5   0  
    Busulfan   3.6   100  
    Fludarabine   0   100  
Diagnosis, %   
    AML   31.0   28.4  
    CML   18.3   11.9  
    MDS   15.2   13.4  
    NHL   9.6   19.4  
    ALL   14.7   3.0  
    CLL   2.0   11.9  
    Other   9.1   11.9  
Risk group, %   
    Low   36.6   11.9  
    High   63.4   88.1  
CMV serology of donor/recipient, %   
    D-/R-  48.2   39.7  
    D-/R+  13.7   22.4  
    D+/R-  19.3   25.9  
    D+/R+  18.8   12.1  
GVHD prophylaxis, %§   
    Methotrexate   72.1   0  
    Cyclosporine   27.4   100  
    Tacrolimus   54.3   0  
    Sirolimus   21.8   0  
    MMF   1.0   16.4  
    T-cell manipulation  22.8   6.0  
    Corticosteroids   18.8   94.0  
Total patient-days   64 759   18 485  
Median follow-up, d (IQR)   255 (102-527)   250 (181-341)  
Median survival, d (95% CI)
 
468 (257-871 +)
 
341 (249-503)
 

Follow-up ended on June 30, 2002, for analysis. The table includes the patients who received an HSC transplant from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2001, except those excluded as explained in the text. TBI indicates total body irradiation; ATG, antithymocyte globulin; AML, acute myelogenous leukemia; CML, chronic myelogenous leukemia; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma; ALL, acute lymphocytic leukemia; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; and other, other hematologic malignancies (myeloproliferative syndromes, Hodgkin disease, multiple myeloma, etc).

*

Patients were considered HLA matched if all 6 of 6 HLA-A, -B and -DR were identical.

Diseases considered low risk were AML or ALL in first complete remission, CML in first chronic phase, aplastic anemia, refractory anemia, and refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts; all other diseases were considered high risk.

CMV serology data were incomplete in 9 nonmyeloablative recipients (n = 58).

§

Most patients received more than one intervention for GVHD prophylaxis except for the subgroup that received a CD6 T-cell—depleted transplant, which received no other prophylaxis.

T-cell manipulations included CD6 depletion, CD8 depletion, or CD34 selection, depending on the treatment protocol used.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal