Table 1.

Patient characteristics of the 234 children with de novo AML included in this study




Study population

FLT3/ITD-positive patients

Patients with successful drug-resistance assay
No. (%)   234   27 (11.5)   134§ 
WBC at diagnosis, median (P25-P75), × 109/L   30.5 (11.8-94.2)   50.3 (21.2-117.3)   39.9 (15.2-117.4)  
Male/female ratio   126:108   18:9   68:66  
Age at diagnosis, median (P25-P75), y   8.8 (2.8-13.2)   13.4* (10.7-15.2)   8.7 (3.2-13.3)  
AML-BFM risk groups    
SR   80   9   54  
HR   154   18   80  
FAB    
M0   9   1   6  
M1   27   6  15  
M2   69   10  37  
M3   9   2   6  
M4 (Eo+)   55 (21)   5 (0)   41 (17)  
M5   53   2  27  
M6   4   1   1  
M7   8   0   1  
Cytogenetic analysis    
Normal   54   12  32  
t(8;21)   25   1   10  
inv(16)   12   0   10  
t(15;17)   5   1   3  
11q23 abnormalities   34   0  8  
Single random abnormalities   25   5   12  
Multiple abnormalities   27   1   11  
Abnormalities of chromosome 5 or 7   8   0   5  
Trisomy 8 alone   7   2   5  
Unknown   37   5   28  
Treatment protocol    
AML-BFM 87   3   0   3  
AML-BFM 93   79   9   64  
AML-BFM 98   83   13   18  
DCLSG-ANLL 87   9   3   11  
DCLSG-ANLL 94
 
60
 
2
 
38
 



Study population

FLT3/ITD-positive patients

Patients with successful drug-resistance assay
No. (%)   234   27 (11.5)   134§ 
WBC at diagnosis, median (P25-P75), × 109/L   30.5 (11.8-94.2)   50.3 (21.2-117.3)   39.9 (15.2-117.4)  
Male/female ratio   126:108   18:9   68:66  
Age at diagnosis, median (P25-P75), y   8.8 (2.8-13.2)   13.4* (10.7-15.2)   8.7 (3.2-13.3)  
AML-BFM risk groups    
SR   80   9   54  
HR   154   18   80  
FAB    
M0   9   1   6  
M1   27   6  15  
M2   69   10  37  
M3   9   2   6  
M4 (Eo+)   55 (21)   5 (0)   41 (17)  
M5   53   2  27  
M6   4   1   1  
M7   8   0   1  
Cytogenetic analysis    
Normal   54   12  32  
t(8;21)   25   1   10  
inv(16)   12   0   10  
t(15;17)   5   1   3  
11q23 abnormalities   34   0  8  
Single random abnormalities   25   5   12  
Multiple abnormalities   27   1   11  
Abnormalities of chromosome 5 or 7   8   0   5  
Trisomy 8 alone   7   2   5  
Unknown   37   5   28  
Treatment protocol    
AML-BFM 87   3   0   3  
AML-BFM 93   79   9   64  
AML-BFM 98   83   13   18  
DCLSG-ANLL 87   9   3   11  
DCLSG-ANLL 94
 
60
 
2
 
38
 

FLT3/ITD was detected in 27 samples. In addition, the clinical characteristics of the subgroup of 134 children (15 with and 119 without FLT3/ITD) with successful cellular drug-resistance assay are given.

P25-P75 indicates 25th to 75th percentiles.

*

FLT3/ITD-positive patients were significantly older than FLT3/ITD-negative patients (median, 13.4 vs 8.8 years; P < .001). In addition, the frequency of FLT3/ITD was age dependent (“Results”).

Samples with normal karyotype were found in 54.5% of FLT3/ITD-positive samples versus 24.7% of FLT3/ITD-negative samples (P = .003), and no FLT3/ITD was found in any of AML samples with 11q23 abnormalities (P = .02).

FAB M1/M2 was found in 59% of FLT3/ITD-positive samples versus 39% in the FLT3/ITD-negative group (P = .04). M5 was found in 7% of FLT3/ITD-positive samples versus 23% in the FLT3/ITD-negative group (P = .04).

§

Includes 15 FLT3/ITD-positive patients.

Patients with successful drug-resistance assay were significantly older (8.7 vs 3.9 years; P = .009) and had higher WBC counts at diagnosis (39.9 × 109/L vs 13.8 × 109/L; P < .001) compared with those without successful assay.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal