Table 2.

IgH translocation prevalence according to nonhyperdiploid versus hyperdiploid status (Mayo patients)





Nonhyperdiploid MM
Category and status of IgH
No. patients
Hyperdiploid
Total
Hypodiploid
Pseudodiploid
Tetraploid
VH/CH strategy       
Not translocated, no. (% of row)   36   22 (61)   14 (39)   2 (6)   11 (31)   1 (3)  
Translocated, no. (% of row), P < .0001   44   5 (11)   39 (89)   7 (16)   26 (59)   6 (14)  
t(11;14)(q13;q32) translocated (% of row), P NA   29   2 (7)   27 (93)   9 (31)   15 (52)   3 (10)  
Total patients, no.*
 
109
 
29
 
80
 
18
 
52
 
10
 




Nonhyperdiploid MM
Category and status of IgH
No. patients
Hyperdiploid
Total
Hypodiploid
Pseudodiploid
Tetraploid
VH/CH strategy       
Not translocated, no. (% of row)   36   22 (61)   14 (39)   2 (6)   11 (31)   1 (3)  
Translocated, no. (% of row), P < .0001   44   5 (11)   39 (89)   7 (16)   26 (59)   6 (14)  
t(11;14)(q13;q32) translocated (% of row), P NA   29   2 (7)   27 (93)   9 (31)   15 (52)   3 (10)  
Total patients, no.*
 
109
 
29
 
80
 
18
 
52
 
10
 

Numbers are skewed toward nonhyperdiploid MM, and should not be used to calculate prevalence of ploidy category because of the inclusion of cases with t(11;14)(q13;q32) karyotype detected.

NA indicates not applicable.

*

Includes patients with either a positive VH/CH break-apart FISH assay or a t(11;14)(q13;q32).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal