Phenotypic analysis of PBLs from LDGL patients
Patient no. . | CD16+ CD3- cells, % . | KIR2DL1 KIR2DS1 (EB6b) . | KIR2DL2/3 KIR2DS2 (GL183) . | KIR2DS4 (FES172) . | KIR3DL1 KIR3DS1 (Z27) . | KIR3DL2 (Q66) . | CD94 (XA185) . | NKG2-A (Z199) . | LIR-1 (F278) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1* | 82 | 1 | 81† | 0 | 2 | 1 | 85 | 87 | 55 |
2* | 51 | 51† | 8 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 77 | 9 | 45 |
3* | 64 | 1 | 1 | 65† | 1 | 0 | 67 | 66 | 31 |
4* | 75 | 0 | 75† | 0 | 0 | 27 | 76 | 75 | 62 |
5 | 71 | 1 | 73† | 0 | 0 | 0 | 79 | 75 | 45 |
6 | 48 | 5 | 48† | 0 | 0 | 7 | 62 | 4 | 35 |
7 | 40 | 0 | 39† | 1 | 1 | 0 | 45 | 42 | 29 |
8 | 35 | 0 | 31† | 1 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 34 | 34 |
9* | 34 | 25 | 17 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 35 | 31 | 29 |
10* | 62 | 29 | 15 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 33 | 35 | 32 |
11 | 50 | 25 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 38 | 35 | 49 |
12 | 46 | 8 | 23 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 45 | 48 | 35 |
13 | 70 | 12 | 6 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 74 | 73 | 77 |
14 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 1 | 10 | 42 | 40 | 37 |
15* | 73 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 75 | 73 | 68 |
16 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 48 | 44 | 31 |
17 | 71 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 78 | 73 | 52 |
18 | 67 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 69 | 68 | 42 |
CTR1 | 14 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 20 | 12 | 12 |
CTR2 | 16 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 4 | 4 |
Patient no. . | CD16+ CD3- cells, % . | KIR2DL1 KIR2DS1 (EB6b) . | KIR2DL2/3 KIR2DS2 (GL183) . | KIR2DS4 (FES172) . | KIR3DL1 KIR3DS1 (Z27) . | KIR3DL2 (Q66) . | CD94 (XA185) . | NKG2-A (Z199) . | LIR-1 (F278) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1* | 82 | 1 | 81† | 0 | 2 | 1 | 85 | 87 | 55 |
2* | 51 | 51† | 8 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 77 | 9 | 45 |
3* | 64 | 1 | 1 | 65† | 1 | 0 | 67 | 66 | 31 |
4* | 75 | 0 | 75† | 0 | 0 | 27 | 76 | 75 | 62 |
5 | 71 | 1 | 73† | 0 | 0 | 0 | 79 | 75 | 45 |
6 | 48 | 5 | 48† | 0 | 0 | 7 | 62 | 4 | 35 |
7 | 40 | 0 | 39† | 1 | 1 | 0 | 45 | 42 | 29 |
8 | 35 | 0 | 31† | 1 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 34 | 34 |
9* | 34 | 25 | 17 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 35 | 31 | 29 |
10* | 62 | 29 | 15 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 33 | 35 | 32 |
11 | 50 | 25 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 38 | 35 | 49 |
12 | 46 | 8 | 23 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 45 | 48 | 35 |
13 | 70 | 12 | 6 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 74 | 73 | 77 |
14 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 1 | 10 | 42 | 40 | 37 |
15* | 73 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 75 | 73 | 68 |
16 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 48 | 44 | 31 |
17 | 71 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 78 | 73 | 52 |
18 | 67 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 69 | 68 | 42 |
CTR1 | 14 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 20 | 12 | 12 |
CTR2 | 16 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 4 | 4 |
Surface expression of the various receptors was evaluated by FACS analysis using the mAbs indicated in parentheses. Values indicate percentage of positive cells.
The 7 patients from whom it was possible to derive a polyclonal NKLGL line.
Values in which the percent of NK cells stained by a given anti-KIR mAb approximated that of CD16+CD3- cells.