De novo expression of CTA in AML and MDS patients treated with decitabine
Patient no. . | Diagnosis . | FAB . | T . | BM blasts, % . | PB blasts, % . | MAGE-1 . | SSX . | NY-ESO-1 . | β-actin . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | de novo AML | M1 | 0 | 90 | 87 | - | - | - | + |
15 | nd | 66 | + | + | + | + | |||
30 | nd | 64 | + | - | + | + | |||
2 | de novo AML | M1 | 0 | 80 | 86 | - | + | - | + |
15 | nd | 75 | + | + | + | + | |||
3 | de novo AML | M1 | 0 | 95 | 90 | - | - | - | + |
15 | nd | 18 | + | + | + | + | |||
30 | nd | 5 | - | + | + | + | |||
4 | de novo AML | M4 | 0 | 90 | 75 | - | - | + | + |
15 | nd | 63 | + | + | + | + | |||
30 | nd | 67 | + | + | + | + | |||
40 | nd | 66 | + | + | + | + | |||
5 | de novo AML | M4 | 0 | 65 | 58 | - | - | - | + |
15 | nd | 12 | - | + | + | + | |||
6 | de novo AML | M4 | 0 | 70 | 44 | - | - | - | + |
15 | nd | 25 | + | + | + | + | |||
7 | de novo AML | M5 | 0 | 85 | 67 | - | - | - | + |
15 | nd | 45 | + | + | + | + | |||
8 | secondary AML* | M1 | 0 | 60 | 58 | - | - | - | + |
15 | nd | 45 | + | + | + | + | |||
30 | nd | 49 | + | + | + | + | |||
9 | MDS | AREB-t | 0 | 25 | 2 | - | - | - | + |
15 | 20 | 1 | + | + | + | + | |||
10 | MDS | AREB-t | 0 | 22 | 0 | - | - | - | + |
15 | 7 | 1 | + | + | + | + | |||
11 | MDS | CMMoL | 0 | 15 | 12† | - | - | - | + |
15 | nd | 10† | + | + | + | + | |||
30 | nd | 13† | - | - | - | + |
Patient no. . | Diagnosis . | FAB . | T . | BM blasts, % . | PB blasts, % . | MAGE-1 . | SSX . | NY-ESO-1 . | β-actin . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | de novo AML | M1 | 0 | 90 | 87 | - | - | - | + |
15 | nd | 66 | + | + | + | + | |||
30 | nd | 64 | + | - | + | + | |||
2 | de novo AML | M1 | 0 | 80 | 86 | - | + | - | + |
15 | nd | 75 | + | + | + | + | |||
3 | de novo AML | M1 | 0 | 95 | 90 | - | - | - | + |
15 | nd | 18 | + | + | + | + | |||
30 | nd | 5 | - | + | + | + | |||
4 | de novo AML | M4 | 0 | 90 | 75 | - | - | + | + |
15 | nd | 63 | + | + | + | + | |||
30 | nd | 67 | + | + | + | + | |||
40 | nd | 66 | + | + | + | + | |||
5 | de novo AML | M4 | 0 | 65 | 58 | - | - | - | + |
15 | nd | 12 | - | + | + | + | |||
6 | de novo AML | M4 | 0 | 70 | 44 | - | - | - | + |
15 | nd | 25 | + | + | + | + | |||
7 | de novo AML | M5 | 0 | 85 | 67 | - | - | - | + |
15 | nd | 45 | + | + | + | + | |||
8 | secondary AML* | M1 | 0 | 60 | 58 | - | - | - | + |
15 | nd | 45 | + | + | + | + | |||
30 | nd | 49 | + | + | + | + | |||
9 | MDS | AREB-t | 0 | 25 | 2 | - | - | - | + |
15 | 20 | 1 | + | + | + | + | |||
10 | MDS | AREB-t | 0 | 22 | 0 | - | - | - | + |
15 | 7 | 1 | + | + | + | + | |||
11 | MDS | CMMoL | 0 | 15 | 12† | - | - | - | + |
15 | nd | 10† | + | + | + | + | |||
30 | nd | 13† | - | - | - | + |
Total RNA was extracted from PB or BM (patients no. 9 and 10) MNCs using the TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies, Milan, Italy), according to the manufacturer's instructions. RT was performed on 2 μg total RNA using Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus (MMLV) reverse transcriptase and oligo dT(12-18) as primer. PCR was performed on 100 ng retrotranscribed total RNA, using 50 pmol each sense and antisense primer. Oligonucleotide primer sequences and gene-specific PCR amplification programs used have been previously reported.5 The integrity of RNA and oligo(dT)-synthesized cDNA was confirmed by amplification of all cDNA samples with β-actin-specific primers. Then 10 μL each amplified product was run on a 2% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining.
T indicates time from the beginning of decitabine therapy (days); RAEB-t, refractory anemia with excess blasts in leukemic transformation; CMMoL, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia; and nd, not determined.
Secondary AMLs evolved from a previous myeloproliferative disorder.
Figures refer to the percentage of PB atypical monocytes.