Table 2.

Results indicating that the veto effect is not mediated by contaminating CD34 cells and requires cell contact

Cells*MLR against donor AMLR against donor B
CTL activity
(% responding cultures)
Veto activity
(% inhibition)
CTL activity
(% responding cultures)
Veto activity
(% inhibition)
None 87.5 — 93.75 — 
CD34+ 18.75 79 62.5 33 
CD34 100 Not done —  
CD34+ in transwell 87.5 100 
Cells*MLR against donor AMLR against donor B
CTL activity
(% responding cultures)
Veto activity
(% inhibition)
CTL activity
(% responding cultures)
Veto activity
(% inhibition)
None 87.5 — 93.75 — 
CD34+ 18.75 79 62.5 33 
CD34 100 Not done —  
CD34+ in transwell 87.5 100 

The role of alloreactivity was evaluated by testing the veto effect of the CD34+ cells in comparison to the CD34 cells, which included a significant number of alloreactive T cells compared with the CD34+cells. The role of cell contact was evaluated by using the transwell assay. Briefly, the responder cells to be tested for their cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) response were cultured with irradiated stimulator cells in the lower chamber of the transwell plate. The CD34+ cells were cultured with responder cells in the upper chamber.

*

Cells from donor A were added to a 5-day mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) against stimulator cells from donor A or B.

The CTL activity was tested at the end of a 7-day limiting-dilution culture in microtiter plates. Wells were scored positive for CTL activity when chromium release exceeded the mean spontaneous release value by at least 3 SDs from the mean. Data are the percentages of responding cultures at a cell concentration of 1 × 104 responder cells/well.

Veto activity of tested cells was evaluated by assessment of their capacity to inhibit alloreactive CTL precursors in the MLR to which they were added at a 0.5 ratio of veto to responder cells.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal