Table 3.

Univariate survival analysis in MDS and AML patients

VariableMDSAML
NPNP
Age 279 .02 523 < .00001 
Poor prognosis cytogenetics (-5, -7, 11q23) 279 < .00001 523 < .00001 
Platelets 279 .0017 523 .5  
BM cellularity 279 .2 523 .66  
Absolute lymphocytes 279 .4 523 .20 
AHD 279 .089 523 < .00001 
WBC 279 .5 523 .08  
BM blasts 279 .66 523 .5  
Caspase 3 36 .9 54 .8 
IL-6 43 .83 71 .0004  
Treatment arm 278 .0005 520 .0002 
VariableMDSAML
NPNP
Age 279 .02 523 < .00001 
Poor prognosis cytogenetics (-5, -7, 11q23) 279 < .00001 523 < .00001 
Platelets 279 .0017 523 .5  
BM cellularity 279 .2 523 .66  
Absolute lymphocytes 279 .4 523 .20 
AHD 279 .089 523 < .00001 
WBC 279 .5 523 .08  
BM blasts 279 .66 523 .5  
Caspase 3 36 .9 54 .8 
IL-6 43 .83 71 .0004  
Treatment arm 278 .0005 520 .0002 

Except for platelets, all significant variables had negative effects on survival. Treatment arms were IA, TA, and FAI. Longer survival was observed in the IA arm, whereas no difference was observed between the TA and FAI arms.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal