Table 4.

Estimation of conditioning effect in each diagnostic group on each end point

End pointAML (n = 172)
(95% CI; P)
CML (n = 316)
(95% CI; P)
Cataract 11 events 66 events  
 BUCY vs CY-TBI 1.05 (0.32-3.44; .94) 2.67 (1.56-4.57; .0003
 Multivariable model   
  BUCY vs CY-TBI 1.05 (0.31-3.57; .94) 2.32 (1.32-4.07; .0035
  Acute GVHD 1.05 (0.30-3.69; .94) 1.37 (0.76-2.48; .30) 
  Chronic GVHD 0.27 (0.03-2.39; .24) 2.99 (1.64-5.44; .0003
  Age 1.02 (0.96-1.08; .51) 0.998 (0.975-1.023; .89) 
Pulmonary complications 9 events 46 events 
 BUCY vs CY-TBI 0.75 (0.20-2.80; .67) 0.80 (0.44-1.48; .48) 
 Multivariable model   
  BUCY vs CY-TBI 0.55 (0.14-2.11; .38) 0.70 (0.36-1.33; .27) 
  Acute GVHD 4.46 (0.85-23.5; .078) 1.32 (0.68-2.56; .41) 
  Chronic GVHD 1.60 (0.30-8.48; .58) 2.62 (1.31-5.27; .0067
  Age 0.995 (0.941-1.052; .86) 0.988 (0.958-1.019; .45
Avascular osteonecrosis 10 events 19 events 
 BUCY vs CY-TBI 1.04 (0.30-3.62; .95) 3.09 (1.11-8.57; .0307
 Multivariable model   
  BUCY vs CY-TBI 1.04 (0.30-3.64; .95) 2.52 (0.86-7.43; .094) 
  Acute GVHD 0.79 (0.21-3.03; .73) 1.33 (0.44-4.01; .61) 
  Chronic GVHD 3.18 (0.60-16.9; .17) 7.01 (1.85-26.5; .0041
  Age 0.972 (0.917-1.030; .34) 0.925 (0.880-0.972; .0021
Hair loss 58 events/86 66 events/98 
 BUCY vs CY-TBI 0.30 (0.12-0.80; .0160.61 (0.26-1.43; .25) 
 Multivariable model   
  BUCY vs CY-TBI 0.19 (0.06-0.58; .00350.79 (0.32-1.95; .61) 
  Acute GVHD 2.53 (0.81-7.91; .11) 1.08 (0.43-2.70; .87) 
  Chronic GVHD 2.74 (0.50-15.0; .25) 3.26 (1.11-9.59; .032
  Age 1.046 (1.001-1.094; .0461.027 (0.972-1.077; .37) 
End pointAML (n = 172)
(95% CI; P)
CML (n = 316)
(95% CI; P)
Cataract 11 events 66 events  
 BUCY vs CY-TBI 1.05 (0.32-3.44; .94) 2.67 (1.56-4.57; .0003
 Multivariable model   
  BUCY vs CY-TBI 1.05 (0.31-3.57; .94) 2.32 (1.32-4.07; .0035
  Acute GVHD 1.05 (0.30-3.69; .94) 1.37 (0.76-2.48; .30) 
  Chronic GVHD 0.27 (0.03-2.39; .24) 2.99 (1.64-5.44; .0003
  Age 1.02 (0.96-1.08; .51) 0.998 (0.975-1.023; .89) 
Pulmonary complications 9 events 46 events 
 BUCY vs CY-TBI 0.75 (0.20-2.80; .67) 0.80 (0.44-1.48; .48) 
 Multivariable model   
  BUCY vs CY-TBI 0.55 (0.14-2.11; .38) 0.70 (0.36-1.33; .27) 
  Acute GVHD 4.46 (0.85-23.5; .078) 1.32 (0.68-2.56; .41) 
  Chronic GVHD 1.60 (0.30-8.48; .58) 2.62 (1.31-5.27; .0067
  Age 0.995 (0.941-1.052; .86) 0.988 (0.958-1.019; .45
Avascular osteonecrosis 10 events 19 events 
 BUCY vs CY-TBI 1.04 (0.30-3.62; .95) 3.09 (1.11-8.57; .0307
 Multivariable model   
  BUCY vs CY-TBI 1.04 (0.30-3.64; .95) 2.52 (0.86-7.43; .094) 
  Acute GVHD 0.79 (0.21-3.03; .73) 1.33 (0.44-4.01; .61) 
  Chronic GVHD 3.18 (0.60-16.9; .17) 7.01 (1.85-26.5; .0041
  Age 0.972 (0.917-1.030; .34) 0.925 (0.880-0.972; .0021
Hair loss 58 events/86 66 events/98 
 BUCY vs CY-TBI 0.30 (0.12-0.80; .0160.61 (0.26-1.43; .25) 
 Multivariable model   
  BUCY vs CY-TBI 0.19 (0.06-0.58; .00350.79 (0.32-1.95; .61) 
  Acute GVHD 2.53 (0.81-7.91; .11) 1.08 (0.43-2.70; .87) 
  Chronic GVHD 2.74 (0.50-15.0; .25) 3.26 (1.11-9.59; .032
  Age 1.046 (1.001-1.094; .0461.027 (0.972-1.077; .37) 

Results show estimation of conditioning effect in each diagnostic group on each end point either unadjusted or adjusted on baseline covariates, stratified on trial, using Cox models with estimated HR (for cataracts, pulmonary complications, and avascular osteonecrosis) or logistic models with estimated OR (for hair loss). SignificantP values are in bold.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal