Table 2.

HLA phenotypes of patients with bone marrow failure and PNH

ComparisonHLA-AHLA-BHLA-CHLA-DRHLA-DQ
Hemolytic PNH vs controls NS NS NS DR2; 54% vs 28%
z = 4.1
N = 48 
NS  
Expanded PNH clone present (PNH/AA, PNH/MDS, PNH) vs controls NS NS NS DR2; 58% vs 28%
z = 6.4
N = 89 
NS  
PNH/AA syndrome vs controls NS NS NS DR2; 56% vs 28%
z = 4.5
N = 48 
NS  
PNH/MDS vs controls NS B7; 48% vs 21%
z = 3.5
N = 27 
NS DR2; 74% vs 28%
z = 5.3
N = 29 
NS 
ComparisonHLA-AHLA-BHLA-CHLA-DRHLA-DQ
Hemolytic PNH vs controls NS NS NS DR2; 54% vs 28%
z = 4.1
N = 48 
NS  
Expanded PNH clone present (PNH/AA, PNH/MDS, PNH) vs controls NS NS NS DR2; 58% vs 28%
z = 6.4
N = 89 
NS  
PNH/AA syndrome vs controls NS NS NS DR2; 56% vs 28%
z = 4.5
N = 48 
NS  
PNH/MDS vs controls NS B7; 48% vs 21%
z = 3.5
N = 27 
NS DR2; 74% vs 28%
z = 5.3
N = 29 
NS 

NS indicates not significant.

No statistical differences in HLA phenotype were detected between the patients with florid hemolytic PNH and all other patients in whom PNH clone was detected (64% vs 54%, z = 0.88).

All patients with current florid hemolytic PNH irrespective of the original diagnosis.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal