Table 3.

Cox proportional hazards model for survival: multivariate analysis

Prognostic factorPFSOS
Hazard ratio95% CIPHazard ratio95% CIP
Chemoresistance at BMT 9.2 3, 31 .0003 8.9 1.4, 59 .02 
Type of lymphoma       
 Large-cell B NHL 0.8 0.2, 3.6 .8 2.2 0.2, 22 .5  
 Follicular NHL 0.4 0, 2 .3 0.35 0, 7 .5 
 Hodgkin 0.3 0, 1.7 .2 0.1, 13 .99 
Relapse category       
 Primary refractory 0.5 0.1, 2 .3 1.1 0.1, 9 .9 
 Relapse less than 1 y 0.6 0.2, 2 .4 0.64 0.1, 5.5 .7  
Mobilization arm (G-CSF) 1.2 0.4, 3.5 .7 1.1 0.2, 5.4 .9 
Prognostic factorPFSOS
Hazard ratio95% CIPHazard ratio95% CIP
Chemoresistance at BMT 9.2 3, 31 .0003 8.9 1.4, 59 .02 
Type of lymphoma       
 Large-cell B NHL 0.8 0.2, 3.6 .8 2.2 0.2, 22 .5  
 Follicular NHL 0.4 0, 2 .3 0.35 0, 7 .5 
 Hodgkin 0.3 0, 1.7 .2 0.1, 13 .99 
Relapse category       
 Primary refractory 0.5 0.1, 2 .3 1.1 0.1, 9 .9 
 Relapse less than 1 y 0.6 0.2, 2 .4 0.64 0.1, 5.5 .7  
Mobilization arm (G-CSF) 1.2 0.4, 3.5 .7 1.1 0.2, 5.4 .9 

Patients with chemoresistant disease at transplantation had a 9-fold increased risk for disease progression (P = .0003) and a 9-fold risk for death (P = .02), compared with those with chemosensitive disease. This is after adjusting for other variables such as the type of lymphoma, presence of refractory disease, and type of mobilization. These other factors were not significant predictors of disease progression or survival.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal