Table 3.

Comparison of prognostic models including β2m ≥ 2.5 mg/L and another factor3-150

Factor in addition to
β2m ≥ 2.5 mg/L
Decrease in −2 × logarithm (likelihood)
(n = 110)(n = 108)(n = 102)(n = 100)(n = 90)
None 18.465 18.269 15.384 15.202 10.950  
Chr 13 deletion 35.643 35.620 33.767 34.768 27.736  
Age ≥ 60 y 22.842 22.782 18.300 18.169 13.303  
Creatinine > 12 mg/L 22.076 21.818 18.953 18.707 14.301 
Isotype IgA  32.148  30.260 24.214  
λ light chain  24.503  20.232 15.646  
CRP ≥ 6 mg/L   21.477 21.262 17.734  
LDH > 230 UI/L     17.313 
Sample Any patient Except non-excreting
MM 
Except CRP missing Except non-excreting MM
and CRP missing 
Except non-excreting MM,
CRP and LDH missing 
Factor in addition to
β2m ≥ 2.5 mg/L
Decrease in −2 × logarithm (likelihood)
(n = 110)(n = 108)(n = 102)(n = 100)(n = 90)
None 18.465 18.269 15.384 15.202 10.950  
Chr 13 deletion 35.643 35.620 33.767 34.768 27.736  
Age ≥ 60 y 22.842 22.782 18.300 18.169 13.303  
Creatinine > 12 mg/L 22.076 21.818 18.953 18.707 14.301 
Isotype IgA  32.148  30.260 24.214  
λ light chain  24.503  20.232 15.646  
CRP ≥ 6 mg/L   21.477 21.262 17.734  
LDH > 230 UI/L     17.313 
Sample Any patient Except non-excreting
MM 
Except CRP missing Except non-excreting MM
and CRP missing 
Except non-excreting MM,
CRP and LDH missing 
F3-150

Only relevant combinations are presented. The higher the decrease in −2 × logarithm (likelihood), which follows a chi-square distribution with 2 degrees of freedom (except in line “non” with one degree of freedom), the more powerful is the corresponding model.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal