Table 4.

Possible sources of variation in the findings of the available randomized controlled trials investigating the association between perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion and postoperative bacterial infection: integration of the findings of studies sharing a particular design characteristic by a meta-analysis

Study attributeCategories of study attributeNumber of studiesQ test statistic: PvalueSummary odds ratio4-150
Point estimate95% confidence interval
Study organization Single center3-7  > .05 2.294-151 1.35-3.874-151 
 Multicenter22 23   .95  0.88 0.69-1.12 
Surgical setting Open heart surgery6 N/A 1.424-153 1.00-1.994-153 
 Elective abdominal surgery3-5,7,22 23  < .001 N/A4-155 N/A4-155 
Homogeneity of patients having  Colorectal cancer4,22 23  > .10  0.96 0.67-1.37 
 elective abdominal surgery: diagnosis Any disease of the colorectum35 or gastrointestinal tract7 > .25  2.954-151 1.73-5.054-151 
RBC product transfused to the  Allogeneic whole blood3 N/A 7.324-154 1.62-33.124-154 
 treatment arm Allogeneic RBCs7 N/A 1.854-154 0.89-3.854-154 
 Buffy-coat–reduced RBCs4-6,22 23  < .001 N/A4-155 N/A4-155 
RBC product transfused to the  Autologous RBCs4 or whole blood23 > .05  1.35 0.45-4.08 
 control arm WBC-reduced allogeneic RBCs5-7 22 or whole blood3 < .001 N/A4-155 N/A4-155 
 WBC-reduced allogeneic RBCs5-7 22  < .001 N/A4-155 N/A4-155 
 Fresh-filtered, WBC-reduced allogeneic RBCs6 22  < .05  N/A4-155 N/A4-155 
 WBC-reduced allogeneic RBCs or whole blood filtered after storage3,5 6  < .01  N/A4-155 N/A4-155 
Overall  Exceeding 20%22 23   .95  0.88 0.69-1.12 
 postoperative infection rate# 20% or lower3-7  > .05  2.294-151 1.35-3.874-151 
Overall percentage  Less than 50%57 > .10  2.734-151 1.48-5.044-151 
 of patients having  50% to 67%3,22 23  > .10  0.96 0.62-1.49 
 transfusion# More than 67%46 > .25  1.534-151 1.00-2.334-151 
Reported by Jensen  Jensen et al35  .50  3.68 2.11-6.43 
 et al or by other teams of investigators Other teams4,6,7,22 23  > .05  1.17 0.84-1.62 
Study attributeCategories of study attributeNumber of studiesQ test statistic: PvalueSummary odds ratio4-150
Point estimate95% confidence interval
Study organization Single center3-7  > .05 2.294-151 1.35-3.874-151 
 Multicenter22 23   .95  0.88 0.69-1.12 
Surgical setting Open heart surgery6 N/A 1.424-153 1.00-1.994-153 
 Elective abdominal surgery3-5,7,22 23  < .001 N/A4-155 N/A4-155 
Homogeneity of patients having  Colorectal cancer4,22 23  > .10  0.96 0.67-1.37 
 elective abdominal surgery: diagnosis Any disease of the colorectum35 or gastrointestinal tract7 > .25  2.954-151 1.73-5.054-151 
RBC product transfused to the  Allogeneic whole blood3 N/A 7.324-154 1.62-33.124-154 
 treatment arm Allogeneic RBCs7 N/A 1.854-154 0.89-3.854-154 
 Buffy-coat–reduced RBCs4-6,22 23  < .001 N/A4-155 N/A4-155 
RBC product transfused to the  Autologous RBCs4 or whole blood23 > .05  1.35 0.45-4.08 
 control arm WBC-reduced allogeneic RBCs5-7 22 or whole blood3 < .001 N/A4-155 N/A4-155 
 WBC-reduced allogeneic RBCs5-7 22  < .001 N/A4-155 N/A4-155 
 Fresh-filtered, WBC-reduced allogeneic RBCs6 22  < .05  N/A4-155 N/A4-155 
 WBC-reduced allogeneic RBCs or whole blood filtered after storage3,5 6  < .01  N/A4-155 N/A4-155 
Overall  Exceeding 20%22 23   .95  0.88 0.69-1.12 
 postoperative infection rate# 20% or lower3-7  > .05  2.294-151 1.35-3.874-151 
Overall percentage  Less than 50%57 > .10  2.734-151 1.48-5.044-151 
 of patients having  50% to 67%3,22 23  > .10  0.96 0.62-1.49 
 transfusion# More than 67%46 > .25  1.534-151 1.00-2.334-151 
Reported by Jensen  Jensen et al35  .50  3.68 2.11-6.43 
 et al or by other teams of investigators Other teams4,6,7,22 23  > .05  1.17 0.84-1.62 

RBC(s) indicates red blood cell(s); WBC, white blood cell; N/A, not applicable.

F4-150

Calculated by the method of DerSimonian and Laird.56 

F4-151

Statistically significant (P ≤ .05) summary odds ratio.

Not applicable because only one study was available for meta-analysis.

F4-153

Odds ratio of postoperative infection in patients receiving buffy-coat–reduced RBCs, as compared with recipients of WBC-reduced, buffy-coat–reduced RBCs filtered before or after storage.

F4-155

P < .05 for the Q test statistic; accordingly, the results of the studies could not be integrated by a meta-analysis, and N/A is shown under the summary odds ratio.

F4-154

Odds ratio shown not as reported by the authors, but as recalculated according to an intention-to-treat analysis.

#In the entire study population regardless of randomization arm.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal