Table 3.

Comparison of T-cell-depletion methods in multivariate analysis of treatment failure3-150

Relative risk (95% CI) PAdjusted 5-y LFS3-151 (95% CI)
Narrow-specificity antibodies  1.00 3-152 25% ± 5%  
Broad-specificity antibodies 1.37 (1.04-1.81)3-153 .03  13% ± 10%  
Campath antibodies  1.58 (1.26-1.99)3-153 .0001  12% ± 6% 
Elutriation  1.65 (1.23-2.19)3-153 .0007  17% ± 10% 
Lectins  1.47 (1.18-1.84)3-153 .0007 15% ± 7% 
Relative risk (95% CI) PAdjusted 5-y LFS3-151 (95% CI)
Narrow-specificity antibodies  1.00 3-152 25% ± 5%  
Broad-specificity antibodies 1.37 (1.04-1.81)3-153 .03  13% ± 10%  
Campath antibodies  1.58 (1.26-1.99)3-153 .0001  12% ± 6% 
Elutriation  1.65 (1.23-2.19)3-153 .0007  17% ± 10% 
Lectins  1.47 (1.18-1.84)3-153 .0007 15% ± 7% 
F3-150

Other significant covariates were pretransplant disease state, patient age, performance score, donor-recipient relationship and HLA histocompatibility, year of transplantation; intensity of conditioning regimen and posttransplant immune suppression were not significantly associated with treatment failure. There was no significant interaction between prognostic factors.

F3-151

Five-year probability of leukemia-free survival estimated from the multivariate model assuming a distribution of prognostic factors equal to that in the entire study population.

F3-152

Reference group.

F3-153

These groups are not significantly different from each other.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal