Table 2.

Competitive repopulation in primary and secondary transplants

Treatment CFU-GEMMCFC Pre-B CFU
PBS EpoPBS Epo PBS Epo
Primary recipients 64 ± 9.5% (119)  100 ± 0% (89) 49 ± 7.3% (72)  100 ± 0% (109) 52 ± 9.6% (204)  84 ± 8.3% (153)  
Secondary recipients  71 ± 14% (28)  96 ± 3.5% (25) 70 ± 10% (35)  86 ± 4.0% (20) 71 ± 5.0% (24)  86 ± 4.0% (20) 
Treatment CFU-GEMMCFC Pre-B CFU
PBS EpoPBS Epo PBS Epo
Primary recipients 64 ± 9.5% (119)  100 ± 0% (89) 49 ± 7.3% (72)  100 ± 0% (109) 52 ± 9.6% (204)  84 ± 8.3% (153)  
Secondary recipients  71 ± 14% (28)  96 ± 3.5% (25) 70 ± 10% (35)  86 ± 4.0% (20) 71 ± 5.0% (24)  86 ± 4.0% (20) 

Percentages are the mean % ± SEM of transgene-bearing colonies detected in BM harvested from animals 6 months after primary and secondary transplants. Numbers in parentheses represent total colonies of each class analyzed. There were a total of 11 to 15 different animals for each group (PBS and epo-treated) in the primary transplants and 2 animals for each group in the secondary transplants. P ≤ .05 for each type of CFU when percentage of cells of transgene origin in epo-treated primary recipients is compared to the percentage in PBS-treated animals, and <.001 when compared to the input ratio (50/50). P values for percent transgene-bearing CFU in the secondary transplant epo-treated animals when compared to secondary PBS-treated animals were .15, .038, and .18 (GEMM, CFC, pre-B) and .018, .28, .061 when compared to the percent transgene-bearing CFU in the primary PBS-treated donor animals.

Abbreviations are as in Table 1.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal