Table 3.

Flow Cytometric Analysis of 7 Different Rh SDM Mutant K562 Lines Using Monoclonal Anti-c and E

Anti-c/Anti-E K562/D K562/cE K562/lp3 K562/lp4K562/lp3 + 6 K562/lp4 + 6 K562/lp3 + 4K562/lp3 + 4 + 6 K562/lp6
Anti-c MS33  8.7 39.9 32.9 43.1 37.3 31.3 11.7  17.7 39.9 
Anti-c BS240  3.6 11.2 14.3 18.4 3.8  3.0  3.1  3.8  6.0 
Anti-c MS45  10.6  42.1 30.1 19.3 54.8 30.0 34.7 45.3 20.7 
Anti-c 951  8.4 16.1 5.2  6.8  7.3  5.3  3.3 3.7  10.3 
Anti-c MS40  4.4 10.0 3.7  3.3  4.9  4.6  3.5 3.7  5.3  
Anti-c MS51  9.1  42.1 27.8 34.7 30.8 20.7 10.8 14.1  24.4 
Anti-c MS37  6.4 30.0 16.0 32.7 52.0 24.1 10.6  11.2 19.2 
Anti-E 906  2.9 10.9 8.7 4.1 2.3  2.8  2.7  2.9  12.7 
Anti-E H98  3.9  26.0 2.8  2.8 2.5  2.9  2.8  3.0  2.7  
Anti-E H4-1  3.6 32.0 15.7 27.4 3.2  3.2  3.3  3.3 47.2 
Anti-E HIRO-18  3.6 50.1 22.5 40.8 3.6  4.3  3.6  4.2 41.1 
Anti-c/Anti-E K562/D K562/cE K562/lp3 K562/lp4K562/lp3 + 6 K562/lp4 + 6 K562/lp3 + 4K562/lp3 + 4 + 6 K562/lp6
Anti-c MS33  8.7 39.9 32.9 43.1 37.3 31.3 11.7  17.7 39.9 
Anti-c BS240  3.6 11.2 14.3 18.4 3.8  3.0  3.1  3.8  6.0 
Anti-c MS45  10.6  42.1 30.1 19.3 54.8 30.0 34.7 45.3 20.7 
Anti-c 951  8.4 16.1 5.2  6.8  7.3  5.3  3.3 3.7  10.3 
Anti-c MS40  4.4 10.0 3.7  3.3  4.9  4.6  3.5 3.7  5.3  
Anti-c MS51  9.1  42.1 27.8 34.7 30.8 20.7 10.8 14.1  24.4 
Anti-c MS37  6.4 30.0 16.0 32.7 52.0 24.1 10.6  11.2 19.2 
Anti-E 906  2.9 10.9 8.7 4.1 2.3  2.8  2.7  2.9  12.7 
Anti-E H98  3.9  26.0 2.8  2.8 2.5  2.9  2.8  3.0  2.7  
Anti-E H4-1  3.6 32.0 15.7 27.4 3.2  3.2  3.3  3.3 47.2 
Anti-E HIRO-18  3.6 50.1 22.5 40.8 3.6  4.3  3.6  4.2 41.1 

Values in the table are expressed as the mean fluorescence intensity. Values twice that of background antibody binding (ie, that observed binding to a negative control K562 line) are considered positive and are shaded gray and boldfaced. The results indicate that some K562 SDM mutant clones exhibit partial c phenotypes in that they bind some anti-c but not all.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal