Table 2.

Prognostic Factors for Achievement of CR for 53 AML Patients

Parameters Patients Who Achieved CR (32 patients)Patients Who Did Not Achieve CR (21 patients)P Value
MDR parameters  
 Pgp (measured by flow cytometry)  1.81 ± 0.79  3.01 ± 1.51  .004 
 Modulatory effect of CsA on calcein-AM uptake  1.53 ± 0.34 1.90 ± 0.51  .01  
 Modulatory effect of CsA on Rh 123 uptake* 1.51 ± 0.95  2.21 ± 1.12  .02 
 Modulatory effect of CsA on daunorubicin uptake* 1.10 ± 0.52  1.98 ± 0.85  .04  
 MRP (measured by flow cytometry)  1.55 ± 0.33  1.78 ± 0.45  NS 
 Modulatory effect of probenecid on calcein efflux 1.53 ± 0.25  1.73 ± 0.27  .03  
 LRP (measured by flow cytometry)  3.54 ± 1.71  4.05 ± 1.66  NS 
Other parameters  
 Age (yr)  52 ± 19 59 ± 19  .05  
 CD34+ patients (%) 52%  85%  .01  
 Unfavorable cytogenetic   2% 28%  .02 
Parameters Patients Who Achieved CR (32 patients)Patients Who Did Not Achieve CR (21 patients)P Value
MDR parameters  
 Pgp (measured by flow cytometry)  1.81 ± 0.79  3.01 ± 1.51  .004 
 Modulatory effect of CsA on calcein-AM uptake  1.53 ± 0.34 1.90 ± 0.51  .01  
 Modulatory effect of CsA on Rh 123 uptake* 1.51 ± 0.95  2.21 ± 1.12  .02 
 Modulatory effect of CsA on daunorubicin uptake* 1.10 ± 0.52  1.98 ± 0.85  .04  
 MRP (measured by flow cytometry)  1.55 ± 0.33  1.78 ± 0.45  NS 
 Modulatory effect of probenecid on calcein efflux 1.53 ± 0.25  1.73 ± 0.27  .03  
 LRP (measured by flow cytometry)  3.54 ± 1.71  4.05 ± 1.66  NS 
Other parameters  
 Age (yr)  52 ± 19 59 ± 19  .05  
 CD34+ patients (%) 52%  85%  .01  
 Unfavorable cytogenetic   2% 28%  .02 

*Only 49 patients were tested.

Samples were considered positive for CD34 when more than 20% of viable cells were stained with CD34 antibody in excess of the negative control.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal