Table 4.

TPO Synergism in Platelet Activation

Patient No.123456
ADPTPO + ADPTPO+ADPADPTRAPTPO + TRAPTPO+TRAPTRAP
26.8 23.3 0.87 48.6 45.4 0.93 
43.9 45.3 1.03 68.5 65.6 0.96 
24.9 24.0 0.96 23.9 19.9 0.83 
9.8 10.9 1.11 6.8 8.6 1.26 
27.3 28.7 1.05 29.6 31.4 1.06 
TAR (mean ± SD; n = 5) 27 ± 12 26 ± 12 1.00 ± 0.09 36 ± 24 34 ± 22 1.01 ± 0.16 
Healthy control (mean ± SD; n = 10) 25 ± 11 38 ± 10 1.61 ± 0.28 39 ± 25 50 ± 28 1.43 ± 0.33 
Patient No.123456
ADPTPO + ADPTPO+ADPADPTRAPTPO + TRAPTPO+TRAPTRAP
26.8 23.3 0.87 48.6 45.4 0.93 
43.9 45.3 1.03 68.5 65.6 0.96 
24.9 24.0 0.96 23.9 19.9 0.83 
9.8 10.9 1.11 6.8 8.6 1.26 
27.3 28.7 1.05 29.6 31.4 1.06 
TAR (mean ± SD; n = 5) 27 ± 12 26 ± 12 1.00 ± 0.09 36 ± 24 34 ± 22 1.01 ± 0.16 
Healthy control (mean ± SD; n = 10) 25 ± 11 38 ± 10 1.61 ± 0.28 39 ± 25 50 ± 28 1.43 ± 0.33 

Platelets of TAR patients and of 10 healthy controls were stimulated with either ADP (50 μmol/L, columns 1-3) or TRAP (5 μmol/L, columns 4-6) with (columns 2 and 5) or without (columns 1 and 4) preincubation with rhTPO (20 ng/mL) and analyzed for CD62P expression by flow cytometry. The percentage of CD62P-positive cells after stimulation with or without rhTPO preincubation, as well as the ratio between these data (columns 3 and 6), are shown. Values are the percentage of CD62P+ cells in all columns except 3 and 6.

Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal