Selected randomized studies defining remission induction therapy in older adults.
Goal . | Remission Induction Agents . | Complete Remission . | Overall Survival . | Comments . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Abbreviations: M, mitoxantrone; A, Ara-C (cytosine arabinoside); D, daunorubicin; I, idarubicin; E, etoposide; T, thioguanine; P, PSC-833; GM-CSF, granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor; G-CSF, granulocyte colony stimulating factor; ND, not done | ||||
1 For comparison of DAT to ADE | ||||
2 For comparison of DAT to MAC | ||||
3 For comparison of ADE to MAC | ||||
Compare Anthracyclines and Anthracenediones | ||||
Lowenberg, 19982 | M (8 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2/d) vs. D (30 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2/d) | 47% vs. 38% P = 0.07 | 39 weeks (median) 9% (5 years) vs. 36 weeks (median) 6% (5 years) P = 0.23 | Early and post-induction death rates were similar for both arms. Patients receiving mitoxantrone had a significantly higher rate of severe infections (25.1% vs 18.6%) and a trend toward a longer duration of aplasia (22 vs 19 days). |
AML Collaborative Group, 199819 | I (8–20 mg/m2/d) + A (100–200 mg/m2/d) vs. D (45–50 mg/m2/d) + A (100–200 mg/m2/d) | 51% vs. 46% P = ND | 33.6 weeks (median) vs. 29.9 weeks (median) P = 0.58 | Early induction failure tended to be higher with idarubicin, while late induction failure was lower. Myelosuppression was greater in patients receiving idarubicin. |
Archimbaud, 199920 | I (8 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2/d) + E (100 mg/m2/d) vs. M (7 mg/m2/d) + A (100–200 mg/m2/d)+ E (100 mg/m2/d) | 45% vs. 50% P = 0.52 | 7 months (median) 21% (2 years) vs. 7 months (median) 21% (2 years) P = ND | No difference between groups in degree of myelosuppression or in early death rates. |
Vary 7+3 Dose | ||||
Buchner, 199721 | D (60 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2/d) vs. D (30 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2/d) | 54% vs. 42% P = 0.038 | 16% (5 years) vs. 10% (5 years) P = 0.11 | The 30 mg daunorubicin arm was closed prematurely due to higher response rates in the 60 mg arm, resulting in 42 patients receiving lower dose daunorubicin, and 130 patients receiving the higher dose. |
Dillman, 199113 | D (45 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2/d) vs. D (45 mg/m2/d) + A (200 mg/m2/d) | 44% vs. 38% P = 0.68 | 11.0 weeks (median) vs. 9.6 weeks (median) P = 0.23 | This study has short overall survival times compared to other studies in this patient population. |
Add Agents | ||||
Goldstone, 200115 | D (50 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2 q 12 hours)+ T (100 mg/m2 q 12 hours) vs. D (50 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2 q 12 hours) + E (100 mg/m2/d) vs. M (12 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2/d | 62% vs. 50% P = 0.0021 vs. 55% P = 0.042 | 12% (5 years) vs. 8% (5 years) P = 0.021 vs. 10% (5 years) P = 0.1,2 0.23 | There were no significant differences in myelosuppression or other toxicities, neutrophils were slower to recover in the mitoxantrone arm. Patients receiving ADE had higher rates of induction death (26% compared to 16% for DAT and 17% for MAC) |
Baer, 20025 | D (60 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2/d)+ E (100 mg/m2/d) vs. D (40 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2/d) + E (60 mg/m2/d) + P (10 mg/kg/d) | 46% vs. 39% P = 0.008 | 7 months (median) vs. 2 months (median) P = 0.48 | Because of concern about excessive mortality on the ADEP arm (25 deaths vs 12 on the ADE arm), it was closed early to to further accrual. Survival between the two arms was similar at one year. |
Use Hematopoietic Growth Factors | ||||
Stone, 19953 | D (45 mg/m2/d) + A (200 mg/m2/d) vs. D (45 mg/m2/d) + A (200 mg/m2/d) + GM-CSF (5 μg/kg/d) | 54% vs. 51% P = 0.61 | 10.8 months (median) vs. 8.4 months (median) P = 0.10 | Median duration of neutropenia was 15 days in the GM-CSF arm and 17 days in placebo arm (P = 0.02). The duration of hospitalization did not differ between the arms; nor did the rates of life-threatening infection, or persistent leukemia. |
Godwin, 199814 | D (45 mg/m2/d) + A (200 mg/m2/d) vs. D (45 mg/m2/d) + A (200 mg/m2/d) + G-CSF | 50% vs. 41% P = 0.89 | 9 months (median) vs. 6 months (median) P = 0.71 | The duration of neutropenia was 15% shorter in the G-CSF arm compared to the placebo arm (P = 0.14). The duration of hospitalization did not differ between the arms; nor did the rates of life-threatening infection, or persistent leukemia. |
Goal . | Remission Induction Agents . | Complete Remission . | Overall Survival . | Comments . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Abbreviations: M, mitoxantrone; A, Ara-C (cytosine arabinoside); D, daunorubicin; I, idarubicin; E, etoposide; T, thioguanine; P, PSC-833; GM-CSF, granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor; G-CSF, granulocyte colony stimulating factor; ND, not done | ||||
1 For comparison of DAT to ADE | ||||
2 For comparison of DAT to MAC | ||||
3 For comparison of ADE to MAC | ||||
Compare Anthracyclines and Anthracenediones | ||||
Lowenberg, 19982 | M (8 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2/d) vs. D (30 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2/d) | 47% vs. 38% P = 0.07 | 39 weeks (median) 9% (5 years) vs. 36 weeks (median) 6% (5 years) P = 0.23 | Early and post-induction death rates were similar for both arms. Patients receiving mitoxantrone had a significantly higher rate of severe infections (25.1% vs 18.6%) and a trend toward a longer duration of aplasia (22 vs 19 days). |
AML Collaborative Group, 199819 | I (8–20 mg/m2/d) + A (100–200 mg/m2/d) vs. D (45–50 mg/m2/d) + A (100–200 mg/m2/d) | 51% vs. 46% P = ND | 33.6 weeks (median) vs. 29.9 weeks (median) P = 0.58 | Early induction failure tended to be higher with idarubicin, while late induction failure was lower. Myelosuppression was greater in patients receiving idarubicin. |
Archimbaud, 199920 | I (8 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2/d) + E (100 mg/m2/d) vs. M (7 mg/m2/d) + A (100–200 mg/m2/d)+ E (100 mg/m2/d) | 45% vs. 50% P = 0.52 | 7 months (median) 21% (2 years) vs. 7 months (median) 21% (2 years) P = ND | No difference between groups in degree of myelosuppression or in early death rates. |
Vary 7+3 Dose | ||||
Buchner, 199721 | D (60 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2/d) vs. D (30 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2/d) | 54% vs. 42% P = 0.038 | 16% (5 years) vs. 10% (5 years) P = 0.11 | The 30 mg daunorubicin arm was closed prematurely due to higher response rates in the 60 mg arm, resulting in 42 patients receiving lower dose daunorubicin, and 130 patients receiving the higher dose. |
Dillman, 199113 | D (45 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2/d) vs. D (45 mg/m2/d) + A (200 mg/m2/d) | 44% vs. 38% P = 0.68 | 11.0 weeks (median) vs. 9.6 weeks (median) P = 0.23 | This study has short overall survival times compared to other studies in this patient population. |
Add Agents | ||||
Goldstone, 200115 | D (50 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2 q 12 hours)+ T (100 mg/m2 q 12 hours) vs. D (50 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2 q 12 hours) + E (100 mg/m2/d) vs. M (12 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2/d | 62% vs. 50% P = 0.0021 vs. 55% P = 0.042 | 12% (5 years) vs. 8% (5 years) P = 0.021 vs. 10% (5 years) P = 0.1,2 0.23 | There were no significant differences in myelosuppression or other toxicities, neutrophils were slower to recover in the mitoxantrone arm. Patients receiving ADE had higher rates of induction death (26% compared to 16% for DAT and 17% for MAC) |
Baer, 20025 | D (60 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2/d)+ E (100 mg/m2/d) vs. D (40 mg/m2/d) + A (100 mg/m2/d) + E (60 mg/m2/d) + P (10 mg/kg/d) | 46% vs. 39% P = 0.008 | 7 months (median) vs. 2 months (median) P = 0.48 | Because of concern about excessive mortality on the ADEP arm (25 deaths vs 12 on the ADE arm), it was closed early to to further accrual. Survival between the two arms was similar at one year. |
Use Hematopoietic Growth Factors | ||||
Stone, 19953 | D (45 mg/m2/d) + A (200 mg/m2/d) vs. D (45 mg/m2/d) + A (200 mg/m2/d) + GM-CSF (5 μg/kg/d) | 54% vs. 51% P = 0.61 | 10.8 months (median) vs. 8.4 months (median) P = 0.10 | Median duration of neutropenia was 15 days in the GM-CSF arm and 17 days in placebo arm (P = 0.02). The duration of hospitalization did not differ between the arms; nor did the rates of life-threatening infection, or persistent leukemia. |
Godwin, 199814 | D (45 mg/m2/d) + A (200 mg/m2/d) vs. D (45 mg/m2/d) + A (200 mg/m2/d) + G-CSF | 50% vs. 41% P = 0.89 | 9 months (median) vs. 6 months (median) P = 0.71 | The duration of neutropenia was 15% shorter in the G-CSF arm compared to the placebo arm (P = 0.14). The duration of hospitalization did not differ between the arms; nor did the rates of life-threatening infection, or persistent leukemia. |