Table 1.

Estimated pairwise treatment effects on PFS between the 4 conditioning regimen groups after correction of the multiple PSs and other baseline and transplant characteristics

Conditioning typeReference: Bu16000Reference: Bu≥20000Reference: FM100
Adjusted HR (95% CI)*P*Adjusted HR (95% CI)*P*Adjusted HR (95% CI)*P*
Bu≥20000 0.77 (0.55-1.09) .137 Reference — — — 
FM100 0.57 (0.36-0.89) .013 0.73 (0.46-0.98) .044 Reference — 
FM140 0.68 (0.45-1.01) .056 0.87 (0.57-1.34) .554 1.20 (1.03-1.42) .038 
Conditioning typeReference: Bu16000Reference: Bu≥20000Reference: FM100
Adjusted HR (95% CI)*P*Adjusted HR (95% CI)*P*Adjusted HR (95% CI)*P*
Bu≥20000 0.77 (0.55-1.09) .137 Reference — — — 
FM100 0.57 (0.36-0.89) .013 0.73 (0.46-0.98) .044 Reference — 
FM140 0.68 (0.45-1.01) .056 0.87 (0.57-1.34) .554 1.20 (1.03-1.42) .038 

CI, confidence interval.

*

Variables included in the multivariable Cox regression model were propensity score, age (>65 vs ≤65 y), KPS >90 vs ≤90), secondary AML, ELN2017 genetic risk, remission status before transplant, induction failure, donor type, stem cell source, patient and donor cytomegalovirus serostatus, and transplant protocol (on protocol vs standard of care).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal