Targeted agents and combinations in relapsed/refractory indolent B-NHL
Study . | Drug . | Disease . | n . | ORR . | CR . | DOR . | PFS . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Witzig et al4 | Lenalidomide | FL | 22 | 27% | 9% | NR at 16.5 mo | 4.4 mo |
CALGB 504015 | R-lenalidomide | FL | 46 | 76% | 39% | NA | 24 mo |
AUGMENT6 | R-lenalidomide | FL | 147 | ||||
MZL | 31 | 78% | 34% | 36.6 mo | 39.4 mo | ||
Michot et al10 | Obinutuzumab-avadomide | FL | 18 | 83% | 50% | 9.8 mo | 11.2 mo |
DAWN15 | Ibrutinib | FL | 110 | 20.9% | 11% | 19.4 mo | 4.6 mo |
Bartlett et al16 | Ibrutinib | FL | 40 | 37.5% | 12.5% | 13.9 mo | 14 mo |
Noy et al20 | Ibrutinib | MZL | 63 | 48% | 11% | NR at 19.4 mo | 14.2 mo |
Treon et al21 | Ibrutinib | LPL | 63 | 90.5% | 73% | NA | 69.1% at 2 y |
Gopal et al24 | Idelalisib | FL | 72 | 57% | 6% | 12.5 mo | 11 mo |
Dreyling et al26 | Copanlisib | FL | 104 | 59% | 12% | 22.6 mo | 11.2 mo |
MZL | 23 | 70% | |||||
LPL | 6 | 17% | |||||
Flinn et al27 | Duvelisib | FL | 83 | 42.2% | 1.6% | 10 mo | 9.5 mo |
MZL | 18 | 38.8% | |||||
Davids et al28 | Venetoclax | FL | 29 | 29% | 14% | NA | 11 mo |
MZL | 3 | 67% | |||||
LPL | 4 | 100% | |||||
Zinzani et al29 | R-venetoclax | FL | 53 | 33% | 14% | NA | NA |
BR-venetoclax | 51 | 68% | 50% | ||||
Castillo et al30 | Venetoclax | LPL | 30 | 80% | 53% | NA | NA |
Morschhauser et al33 | Tazemetostat | FL | Mut 22 | 82% | 5% | NR at 32 wk | NA |
WT 54 | 35% | 6% | NR at 56 wk |
Study . | Drug . | Disease . | n . | ORR . | CR . | DOR . | PFS . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Witzig et al4 | Lenalidomide | FL | 22 | 27% | 9% | NR at 16.5 mo | 4.4 mo |
CALGB 504015 | R-lenalidomide | FL | 46 | 76% | 39% | NA | 24 mo |
AUGMENT6 | R-lenalidomide | FL | 147 | ||||
MZL | 31 | 78% | 34% | 36.6 mo | 39.4 mo | ||
Michot et al10 | Obinutuzumab-avadomide | FL | 18 | 83% | 50% | 9.8 mo | 11.2 mo |
DAWN15 | Ibrutinib | FL | 110 | 20.9% | 11% | 19.4 mo | 4.6 mo |
Bartlett et al16 | Ibrutinib | FL | 40 | 37.5% | 12.5% | 13.9 mo | 14 mo |
Noy et al20 | Ibrutinib | MZL | 63 | 48% | 11% | NR at 19.4 mo | 14.2 mo |
Treon et al21 | Ibrutinib | LPL | 63 | 90.5% | 73% | NA | 69.1% at 2 y |
Gopal et al24 | Idelalisib | FL | 72 | 57% | 6% | 12.5 mo | 11 mo |
Dreyling et al26 | Copanlisib | FL | 104 | 59% | 12% | 22.6 mo | 11.2 mo |
MZL | 23 | 70% | |||||
LPL | 6 | 17% | |||||
Flinn et al27 | Duvelisib | FL | 83 | 42.2% | 1.6% | 10 mo | 9.5 mo |
MZL | 18 | 38.8% | |||||
Davids et al28 | Venetoclax | FL | 29 | 29% | 14% | NA | 11 mo |
MZL | 3 | 67% | |||||
LPL | 4 | 100% | |||||
Zinzani et al29 | R-venetoclax | FL | 53 | 33% | 14% | NA | NA |
BR-venetoclax | 51 | 68% | 50% | ||||
Castillo et al30 | Venetoclax | LPL | 30 | 80% | 53% | NA | NA |
Morschhauser et al33 | Tazemetostat | FL | Mut 22 | 82% | 5% | NR at 32 wk | NA |
WT 54 | 35% | 6% | NR at 56 wk |
B-NHL, B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma; BR, bendamustine rituximab; CR, complete response; DOR, duration of response; FL, follicular lymphoma; LPL, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma; MZL, marginal zone lymphoma; Mut, mutant; NA, not reported; NR, not reached; ORR, overall response rate; PFS, progression-free survival; R, rituximab; WT, wild type.