Table 3.

Results of comparative studies on BMT, PBSC and UCBT in adults with hematological malignancies

SeriesGraft source, no. of patientsConditioning regimen intensityConditioning regimenATG (yes/no)Median follow-up, moComments (UCBT vs others)Reference
UD vs UCBT for adults with acute leukemia sUCB, n = 98 MAC sUCB: TBI-based, n = 64 Yes 27 Delayed myeloid recovery 47 
BM, n = 584 Bu-based, n = 34 Decreased aGVHD and cGVHD 
 BM: TBI-based, n = 426 Comparable OS and DFS 
UCBT vs UD for adults with acute leukemia sUCB, n = 287 MAC TBI-based, n = 720 No — For AML: lower OS and DFS, higher NRM, no difference in RI 60 
BM, n = 533 Non TBI-based, n = 100 For ALL: similar OS and DFS, no differences in RI and NRM 
UD vs single UCBT for adults with acute leukemia BM, n = 472 MAC BM, TBI-based, n = 321 Yes, 28% 26 Delayed myeloid recovery (vs BM) 48 
PBSC, n = 888 PBSC, TBI-based, n = 583 Yes, 18% 24 Increased NRM but comparable OS and LFS (vs BM) 
UCB, n = 165 UCB, TBI-based, n = 90 Yes, 72% 29  
Sibling, UD vs single UCBT MRD, n = 204 MAC TBI + Cy  36 Comparable OS and LFS 20 
MUD, n = 152 TCF (dUCBT) Delayed myeloid recovery 
MMUD, n = 52  Increased NRM, reduced relapse 
dUCB, n = 128   
UD vs double UCBT for adults with acute leukemia 8/8 PBSC, n = 313 RIC 8/8 PBSC Bu-based, n = 119 Yes 36 Overall results comparable to 8/8 PBSC 61 
7/8 PBSC, n = 111 7/8 PBSC Bu-based, n = 46 24 
dUCB, n = 161 dUCB, TBI-based, n = 121 24 
Non–T-cell–depleted haploidentical transplantation vs UCBT for adults with acute leukemia AML, n = 918 (haploidentical = 360, UCBT = 558) MAC and RIC For MAC, TBF, n = 198 Yes, in 60% of UCBT and 49% of haploidentical AML, haploidentical 20 Delayed engraftment 19 
ALL, n = 528 (haploidentical = 158 UCBT = 370). For RIC, TCF, n = 289 AML UCBT 31 Lower incidence of cGVHD 
  ALL haploidentical 19 Similar relapse, LFS, and NRM 
  ALL UCBT 17  
UCB vs MUD vs MMUD in AL and MDS UCBT, n = 140 MAC Bu-based, n = 181   In pre transplantation positive minimal residual disease: 49 
MUD, n = 344 TBI-based, n = 401 Comparable outcomes after UCBT and MUD, lower relapse for UCBT 
MMUD, n = 98   
Influence of stem cell source on transplantation outcomes for pediatric AML MRD, n = 61 MAC TBI-based, n = 136 Yes, 21% 144 Comparable RI, LFS, and NRM for all sources 62 
MUD, n = 73 Chemotherapy-based, n = 181 MRD allowed better OS 
UCB, n = 183   
SeriesGraft source, no. of patientsConditioning regimen intensityConditioning regimenATG (yes/no)Median follow-up, moComments (UCBT vs others)Reference
UD vs UCBT for adults with acute leukemia sUCB, n = 98 MAC sUCB: TBI-based, n = 64 Yes 27 Delayed myeloid recovery 47 
BM, n = 584 Bu-based, n = 34 Decreased aGVHD and cGVHD 
 BM: TBI-based, n = 426 Comparable OS and DFS 
UCBT vs UD for adults with acute leukemia sUCB, n = 287 MAC TBI-based, n = 720 No — For AML: lower OS and DFS, higher NRM, no difference in RI 60 
BM, n = 533 Non TBI-based, n = 100 For ALL: similar OS and DFS, no differences in RI and NRM 
UD vs single UCBT for adults with acute leukemia BM, n = 472 MAC BM, TBI-based, n = 321 Yes, 28% 26 Delayed myeloid recovery (vs BM) 48 
PBSC, n = 888 PBSC, TBI-based, n = 583 Yes, 18% 24 Increased NRM but comparable OS and LFS (vs BM) 
UCB, n = 165 UCB, TBI-based, n = 90 Yes, 72% 29  
Sibling, UD vs single UCBT MRD, n = 204 MAC TBI + Cy  36 Comparable OS and LFS 20 
MUD, n = 152 TCF (dUCBT) Delayed myeloid recovery 
MMUD, n = 52  Increased NRM, reduced relapse 
dUCB, n = 128   
UD vs double UCBT for adults with acute leukemia 8/8 PBSC, n = 313 RIC 8/8 PBSC Bu-based, n = 119 Yes 36 Overall results comparable to 8/8 PBSC 61 
7/8 PBSC, n = 111 7/8 PBSC Bu-based, n = 46 24 
dUCB, n = 161 dUCB, TBI-based, n = 121 24 
Non–T-cell–depleted haploidentical transplantation vs UCBT for adults with acute leukemia AML, n = 918 (haploidentical = 360, UCBT = 558) MAC and RIC For MAC, TBF, n = 198 Yes, in 60% of UCBT and 49% of haploidentical AML, haploidentical 20 Delayed engraftment 19 
ALL, n = 528 (haploidentical = 158 UCBT = 370). For RIC, TCF, n = 289 AML UCBT 31 Lower incidence of cGVHD 
  ALL haploidentical 19 Similar relapse, LFS, and NRM 
  ALL UCBT 17  
UCB vs MUD vs MMUD in AL and MDS UCBT, n = 140 MAC Bu-based, n = 181   In pre transplantation positive minimal residual disease: 49 
MUD, n = 344 TBI-based, n = 401 Comparable outcomes after UCBT and MUD, lower relapse for UCBT 
MMUD, n = 98   
Influence of stem cell source on transplantation outcomes for pediatric AML MRD, n = 61 MAC TBI-based, n = 136 Yes, 21% 144 Comparable RI, LFS, and NRM for all sources 62 
MUD, n = 73 Chemotherapy-based, n = 181 MRD allowed better OS 
UCB, n = 183   

aGVHD, acute graft-versus-host disease; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; ATG, antithymocyte globulin; BM, bone marrow; BMT, bone marrow transplantation; Bu, busulfan; cGVHD, chronic graft-versus-host disease; DFS, disease-free survival; dUCB, double umbilical cord blood; dUCBT, double umbilical cord blood transplantation; LFS, leukemia-free survival; MAC, myeloablative conditioning regimen; MMUD, mismatched unrelated donor; MRD, matched related donor; MUD, matched unrelated donor; NRM, nonrelapse mortality; OS, overall survival; PBSC, peripheral blood stem cells; RI, relapse incidence; RIC, reduced intensity conditioning regimen; sUCB, single umbilical cord blood; TBI, total body irradiation; TCF, total body irradiation, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide; UBM, unrelated bone marrow; UCBT, umbilical cord blood transplantation; UD, unrelated donor.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal