Table 3.

Multivariable analyses for factors independently associated with RFS and OS

VariableHR95% CIP
RFS    
 FLT3-ITD mutation 1.963 1.281-3.007 .002 
 SCT in first CR 0.399 0.000-0.628 <.0001 
 DN vs myeloid phenotype 0.365 0.000-0.666 .001 
 Monocytic phenotype without TET/IDH comutation vs myeloid phenotype 0.305 0.000-0.550 <.0001 
 Monocytic phenotype with TET/IDH comutation vs myeloid phenotype 0.757 0.445-1.287 .303 
OS    
 FLT3-ITD mutation 1.751 1.076-2.850 .024 
 Age at diagnosis (continuous, per y) 1.030 1.008-1.052 .006 
 DN vs myeloid phenotype 0.417 0.000-0.802 .009 
 Monocytic phenotype without TET/IDH comutation vs myeloid phenotype 0.476 0.000-0.903 .023 
 Monocytic phenotype with TET/IDH comutation vs myeloid phenotype 0.854 0.453-1.609 .624 
VariableHR95% CIP
RFS    
 FLT3-ITD mutation 1.963 1.281-3.007 .002 
 SCT in first CR 0.399 0.000-0.628 <.0001 
 DN vs myeloid phenotype 0.365 0.000-0.666 .001 
 Monocytic phenotype without TET/IDH comutation vs myeloid phenotype 0.305 0.000-0.550 <.0001 
 Monocytic phenotype with TET/IDH comutation vs myeloid phenotype 0.757 0.445-1.287 .303 
OS    
 FLT3-ITD mutation 1.751 1.076-2.850 .024 
 Age at diagnosis (continuous, per y) 1.030 1.008-1.052 .006 
 DN vs myeloid phenotype 0.417 0.000-0.802 .009 
 Monocytic phenotype without TET/IDH comutation vs myeloid phenotype 0.476 0.000-0.903 .023 
 Monocytic phenotype with TET/IDH comutation vs myeloid phenotype 0.854 0.453-1.609 .624 

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal