Table 1

Hazard ratios for survival in 101 patients from AML17 with dual Flt3L measurement and MRD assessment after course 1

HR95% CITestP
EFS     
 Flt3L <291 vs ≥291 0.51 0.31-0.84 Log rank .0076 
 MRD positive vs negative 0.38 0.23-0.61 Log rank .0001 
 Flt3L <291 vs ≥291, adjusting for MRD 0.57 0.32-1.03 Cox .0600 
OS     
 Flt3L <1185 vs ≥1185 0.38 0.18-0.79 Log rank .0097 
 MRD positive vs negative 0.41 0.23-0.73 Log rank .0025 
 Flt3L <1185 vs ≥1185, adjusting for MRD 0.25 0.06-1.05 Cox .0590 
HR95% CITestP
EFS     
 Flt3L <291 vs ≥291 0.51 0.31-0.84 Log rank .0076 
 MRD positive vs negative 0.38 0.23-0.61 Log rank .0001 
 Flt3L <291 vs ≥291, adjusting for MRD 0.57 0.32-1.03 Cox .0600 
OS     
 Flt3L <1185 vs ≥1185 0.38 0.18-0.79 Log rank .0097 
 MRD positive vs negative 0.41 0.23-0.73 Log rank .0025 
 Flt3L <1185 vs ≥1185, adjusting for MRD 0.25 0.06-1.05 Cox .0590 

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal