Table 1

Randomized trials of IL-2 monotherapy versus no treatment (standard-of-care) as remission maintenance in AML patients in CR1

Trial (NCT)*nMedian follow-up (mo)Age yIL-2 regimenPlanned monthly dose (MIU/m2) × no. of moResults, IL-2 vs controlsP, IL-2 vs controls
Blaise et al 200020  78 80 < 50 Cycle 1: 12 MIU/m2 QD × 5 days followed by 4 cycles of 2 days each 120 × 2 7-yr LFS: 30% vs 36% 7-yr OS: 38% vs 47% LFS P = .54 OS P = .65 
ALFA 980121  161 40 50-70 5 MIU/m2 QD × 5 d/mo 25 × 12 4-yr EFS: 28% vs 32% EFS P = .88 
      4-yr OS: 41% vs 47% OS P = .14 
CALGB 972022  (NCT00003190) 163 100 ≥ 60 0.9 MIU/m2 QD × 10-14 days; followed by pulses of 12 MIU/m2 QD × 3 days between each 14-day cycle 82 × 3 No difference in median LFS = 6.1 months No difference in median OS = 14.7 months LFS P = .47 OS P = .61 
CALGB 1980823  (NCT00006363) 214 69 < 60 1 MIU/m2 QD × 10-14 days; followed by pulses of 12-15 MIU/m2 QD × 3 days between each 14-day cycle 91 × 3 3-yr LFS: 56% vs 45% 3-yr OS: 68% vs 61% LFS P = .11 OS P = .09 
CCG-296124  (NCT00002798) 289 54 ≤ 21 9 MIU/m2 QD × 4 days then 1.6 MIU/m2 QD days 8-17 (14 infusions total) 52 × 0.6 5-yr LFS: 51% vs 58% 5-yr OS: 70% vs 73% LFS P = .49 OS P = .73 
EORTC-GIMEMA 699125  (NCT00004128) 550 43 < 61 2.3-4.6 MIU/m2 QD × 5 d/mo 12-24 × 12 3-yr LFS: 44% vs 42% 3-yr OS: 54% vs 56% LFS P = .57 OS P = .94 
Trial (NCT)*nMedian follow-up (mo)Age yIL-2 regimenPlanned monthly dose (MIU/m2) × no. of moResults, IL-2 vs controlsP, IL-2 vs controls
Blaise et al 200020  78 80 < 50 Cycle 1: 12 MIU/m2 QD × 5 days followed by 4 cycles of 2 days each 120 × 2 7-yr LFS: 30% vs 36% 7-yr OS: 38% vs 47% LFS P = .54 OS P = .65 
ALFA 980121  161 40 50-70 5 MIU/m2 QD × 5 d/mo 25 × 12 4-yr EFS: 28% vs 32% EFS P = .88 
      4-yr OS: 41% vs 47% OS P = .14 
CALGB 972022  (NCT00003190) 163 100 ≥ 60 0.9 MIU/m2 QD × 10-14 days; followed by pulses of 12 MIU/m2 QD × 3 days between each 14-day cycle 82 × 3 No difference in median LFS = 6.1 months No difference in median OS = 14.7 months LFS P = .47 OS P = .61 
CALGB 1980823  (NCT00006363) 214 69 < 60 1 MIU/m2 QD × 10-14 days; followed by pulses of 12-15 MIU/m2 QD × 3 days between each 14-day cycle 91 × 3 3-yr LFS: 56% vs 45% 3-yr OS: 68% vs 61% LFS P = .11 OS P = .09 
CCG-296124  (NCT00002798) 289 54 ≤ 21 9 MIU/m2 QD × 4 days then 1.6 MIU/m2 QD days 8-17 (14 infusions total) 52 × 0.6 5-yr LFS: 51% vs 58% 5-yr OS: 70% vs 73% LFS P = .49 OS P = .73 
EORTC-GIMEMA 699125  (NCT00004128) 550 43 < 61 2.3-4.6 MIU/m2 QD × 5 d/mo 12-24 × 12 3-yr LFS: 44% vs 42% 3-yr OS: 54% vs 56% LFS P = .57 OS P = .94 

AML indicates acute myeloid leukemia; LFS, leukemia-free survival; MIU, millions of international units; OS, overall survival; and QD, once daily.

*

ClinicalTrials.gov registry number if available.

IL-2 versus standard-of-care (no treatment).

EFS calculated as the date from randomization to the date of CR achievement failure, first relapse, or death.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal