Table 4

Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios for treatment effect: effect of baseline characteristics on comparison of OS between patients treated with zosuquidar or placebo

FactorUnadjusted model
Adjusted model
HR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)P
Treatment (zosuquidar vs placebo) 1.12 (0.91, 1.37) .282 1.20 (0.89, 1.40) .338 
Sex (male vs female) — — 1.12 (0.90, 1.40) .320 
ECOG PS (1 vs 0) — — 1.11 (0.85, 1.44) .454 
ECOG PS (2 vs 0) — — 1.85 (1.29, 2.65) .001 
ECOG PS (3 vs 0) — — 2.20 (1.28, 3.79) .004 
P-gp ratio (> 1.3 vs ≤ 1.3) — — 1.43 (1.10, 1.85) .007 
Cytogenetics (intermediate risk vs unfavorable) — — 2.04 (1.54, 2.69) < .001 
Cytogenetics (intermediate risk vs unknown) — — 1.13 (0.85, 1.51) .399 
Cytogenetics (intermediate risk vs favorable) — — 0.61 (0.26, 1.40) .240 
FactorUnadjusted model
Adjusted model
HR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)P
Treatment (zosuquidar vs placebo) 1.12 (0.91, 1.37) .282 1.20 (0.89, 1.40) .338 
Sex (male vs female) — — 1.12 (0.90, 1.40) .320 
ECOG PS (1 vs 0) — — 1.11 (0.85, 1.44) .454 
ECOG PS (2 vs 0) — — 1.85 (1.29, 2.65) .001 
ECOG PS (3 vs 0) — — 2.20 (1.28, 3.79) .004 
P-gp ratio (> 1.3 vs ≤ 1.3) — — 1.43 (1.10, 1.85) .007 
Cytogenetics (intermediate risk vs unfavorable) — — 2.04 (1.54, 2.69) < .001 
Cytogenetics (intermediate risk vs unknown) — — 1.13 (0.85, 1.51) .399 
Cytogenetics (intermediate risk vs favorable) — — 0.61 (0.26, 1.40) .240 

Stratified Cox regression models were used for both adjusted and unadjusted models. The stratification factors used for randomization (age < 70 vs ≥ 70 years, disease type [de novo AML or RAEB-t, RAEB, secondary AML]) were included as strata in the models. The HRs were expressed as zosuquidar/placebo. A ratio < 1 would indicate an improved outcome with zosuquidar.

— indicates not applicable.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal