Table 2

Univariate analysis of the effect of genomic complexity on TTFT or TTST estimates, hazard ratios, and significance levels

Previously untreated patients
Previously treated patients
Median TTFT, moHazard ratioSignificance levelMedian TTST, moHazard ratioSignificance level
Genomic complexity (visual)       
    1.5 or more Not reached 1.5 .26 19 1.1 .81 
    2.0 or more Not reached 1.6 .17 20 1.2 .64 
    2.5 or more 31 3.7 <.001 14 .07 
    3.0 or more 25 4.3 <.001 3.4 <.001 
    3.5 or more 23 4.7 <.001 3.6 <.001 
Genomic complexity (visual losses)       
    1.5 or more 81 2.3 .01 18 1.8 .13 
    2.0 or more 79 2.3 .01 15 .06 
    2.5 or more 23 4.3 <.001 2.6 .01 
    3.0 or more 14 5.4 <.001 3.1 <.001 
    3.5 or more 14 6.6 <.001 4.8 <.001 
Previously untreated patients
Previously treated patients
Median TTFT, moHazard ratioSignificance levelMedian TTST, moHazard ratioSignificance level
Genomic complexity (visual)       
    1.5 or more Not reached 1.5 .26 19 1.1 .81 
    2.0 or more Not reached 1.6 .17 20 1.2 .64 
    2.5 or more 31 3.7 <.001 14 .07 
    3.0 or more 25 4.3 <.001 3.4 <.001 
    3.5 or more 23 4.7 <.001 3.6 <.001 
Genomic complexity (visual losses)       
    1.5 or more 81 2.3 .01 18 1.8 .13 
    2.0 or more 79 2.3 .01 15 .06 
    2.5 or more 23 4.3 <.001 2.6 .01 
    3.0 or more 14 5.4 <.001 3.1 <.001 
    3.5 or more 14 6.6 <.001 4.8 <.001 

Time to first therapy (TTFT) and time to subsequent therapy (TTST) were the clinical end points used. For univariate analysis, total visual complexity scores and visual complexity scores based on losses only were divided into bins (eg, < n lesions vs ≥ n lesions). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to esitmate the survivor function to first (TTFT) or subsequent (TTST) treatment for each subgroup, and the log-rank test was used to calculate 2-sided P values testing significant differences in the survivor function between subgroups.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal