Table 2

Compatibility of simulated and observed baboon gene-marking data

Probability values
Compatible
Criterion 1Criterion 2Criterion 3
A. Other mammalian HSC parameters     
    Mouse 
        R0 = 100 (HSC) .49 .25 < .0001 No 
        R0 = 300 .31 .06 < .0001 No 
        R0 = 500 .28 .02 < .0001 No 
    Cat     
        R0 = 100 .41 .25 .07 Yes 
        R0 = 300 .43 .047 < .0001 No 
        R0 = 500 .30 .02 < .0001 No 
B. Estimating replication rate, R0 = 300     
    λ = 1 replication/20 wk .39 .15 .04 No 
    λ = 1 replication/21 wk .42 .10 .054 Yes 
    λ = 1 replication/36 wk .41 .22 .31 Yes 
    λ = 1 replication/70 wk .32 .30 .07 Yes 
    λ = 1 replication/72 wk .48 .31 .04 No 
C. Replication rate, R0 = 100     
    λ = 1 replication/6 wk .43 .23 .03 No 
    λ = 1 replication/7 wk .5 .24 .054 Yes 
    λ = 1 replication/25 wk .29 .30 .057 Yes 
    λ = 1 replication/29 wk .24 .31 .04 No 
D. Replication rate, R0 = 500     
    λ = 1 replication/32 wk .40 .08 .048 No 
    λ = 1 replication/33 wk .39 .13 .050 Yes 
    λ = 1 replication/120 wk .32 .30 .068 Yes 
    λ = 1 replication/125 wk .34 .30 .047 No 
E. Robustness to changes to μ     
    μ = 3.0 wk .07 .31 < .0001 No 
    μ = 4.5 wk .75 .29 .03 No 
    μ = 5.0 wk .60 .29 .050 Yes 
    μ = 8.5 wk .07 .15 .10 Yes 
    μ = 9.0 wk .046 .16 .07 No 
F. Robustness to changes to ν     
    ν = 0.40 γ .47 .30 .049 No 
    ν = 0.45 γ .41 .30 .08 Yes 
    ν = 1.00 γ .45 .17 .23 Yes 
G. Robustness to changes to γ     
    γ = 0.35 λ .61 .29 .04 No 
    γ = 0.40 λ .60 .28 .06 Yes 
    γ = 1.00 λ .38 .23 .46 Yes 
Probability values
Compatible
Criterion 1Criterion 2Criterion 3
A. Other mammalian HSC parameters     
    Mouse 
        R0 = 100 (HSC) .49 .25 < .0001 No 
        R0 = 300 .31 .06 < .0001 No 
        R0 = 500 .28 .02 < .0001 No 
    Cat     
        R0 = 100 .41 .25 .07 Yes 
        R0 = 300 .43 .047 < .0001 No 
        R0 = 500 .30 .02 < .0001 No 
B. Estimating replication rate, R0 = 300     
    λ = 1 replication/20 wk .39 .15 .04 No 
    λ = 1 replication/21 wk .42 .10 .054 Yes 
    λ = 1 replication/36 wk .41 .22 .31 Yes 
    λ = 1 replication/70 wk .32 .30 .07 Yes 
    λ = 1 replication/72 wk .48 .31 .04 No 
C. Replication rate, R0 = 100     
    λ = 1 replication/6 wk .43 .23 .03 No 
    λ = 1 replication/7 wk .5 .24 .054 Yes 
    λ = 1 replication/25 wk .29 .30 .057 Yes 
    λ = 1 replication/29 wk .24 .31 .04 No 
D. Replication rate, R0 = 500     
    λ = 1 replication/32 wk .40 .08 .048 No 
    λ = 1 replication/33 wk .39 .13 .050 Yes 
    λ = 1 replication/120 wk .32 .30 .068 Yes 
    λ = 1 replication/125 wk .34 .30 .047 No 
E. Robustness to changes to μ     
    μ = 3.0 wk .07 .31 < .0001 No 
    μ = 4.5 wk .75 .29 .03 No 
    μ = 5.0 wk .60 .29 .050 Yes 
    μ = 8.5 wk .07 .15 .10 Yes 
    μ = 9.0 wk .046 .16 .07 No 
F. Robustness to changes to ν     
    ν = 0.40 γ .47 .30 .049 No 
    ν = 0.45 γ .41 .30 .08 Yes 
    ν = 1.00 γ .45 .17 .23 Yes 
G. Robustness to changes to γ     
    γ = 0.35 λ .61 .29 .04 No 
    γ = 0.40 λ .60 .28 .06 Yes 
    γ = 1.00 λ .38 .23 .46 Yes 

Criteria 1, 2, and 3 compared the compatibility of marking percentages on the basis of the time until stabilization, the presence of drift, and the amount of variation, respectively.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal