Table 3

Loss of heterozygosity of 16q identified using 500K mapping arrays

LOH statusCytogenetic bandStart Position, MbEnd Position, MbSize, MbCases, n
Deletion 16 all All All All 
UPD 16 all All All All 
Deletion 16q11.2–16q12.1 45.065 54.627 9.562 
UPD 16q11.2–16qter 45.065 88.691 43.626 
Deletion 16q11.2–16qter 45.065 88.691 43.626 10 
Deletion 16q12.1 46.718 50.872 4.154 
Deletion 16q12.1 48.706 49.358 0.652 
Deletion 16q13–16q23.1 55.398 74.985 19.587 
Deletion 16q13–16qter 55.674 88.691 33.017 
Deletion 16q13–16q24.1 56.392 83.586 27.194 
Deletion 16q21–16q24.1 58.469 84.511 26.042 
Deletion 16q23.1–16qter 77.728 88.691 10.963 
LOH statusCytogenetic bandStart Position, MbEnd Position, MbSize, MbCases, n
Deletion 16 all All All All 
UPD 16 all All All All 
Deletion 16q11.2–16q12.1 45.065 54.627 9.562 
UPD 16q11.2–16qter 45.065 88.691 43.626 
Deletion 16q11.2–16qter 45.065 88.691 43.626 10 
Deletion 16q12.1 46.718 50.872 4.154 
Deletion 16q12.1 48.706 49.358 0.652 
Deletion 16q13–16q23.1 55.398 74.985 19.587 
Deletion 16q13–16qter 55.674 88.691 33.017 
Deletion 16q13–16q24.1 56.392 83.586 27.194 
Deletion 16q21–16q24.1 58.469 84.511 26.042 
Deletion 16q23.1–16qter 77.728 88.691 10.963 

The size and location of regions of LOH are shown. Note that 2 cases have either two regions of deletion, or UPD and deletion as demonstrated in Figure 3.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal