Table 3

Analysis of data from 19 HIV+ patients used for PBMC and CD34+ cell proviral analysis

Patient no.CD4, count/μLSexHGB, g/dLPBMC proviral, per 104 cellsCD34+ proviral, per 104 cells
153 11.7 34.8 0.0 
94 13.9 7.3 0.0 
3* 50 9.8 17.32 1262 
4* 104 15.6 77.0 5300 
5* 94 11.3 106 1034 
6* 13 9.8 3.74 3800 
44 11 78.0 0.0 
226 11.9 47.6 145.4 
9‡ 90 9.1 45 195.8 
10 124 14.5 68.4 0.0 
11 75 11.7 5.14 0.0 
12 143 14.4 38.6 0.0 
13* 113 7.7 36.8 354 
14 10 9.6 146.6 0.0 
15‡ 38.6 238 
16* 53 15.6 116.2 742 
17* 54 10 66.8 2080 
18* 71 8.3 101.2 4500 
19* 186 4.8 142 2200 
Patient no.CD4, count/μLSexHGB, g/dLPBMC proviral, per 104 cellsCD34+ proviral, per 104 cells
153 11.7 34.8 0.0 
94 13.9 7.3 0.0 
3* 50 9.8 17.32 1262 
4* 104 15.6 77.0 5300 
5* 94 11.3 106 1034 
6* 13 9.8 3.74 3800 
44 11 78.0 0.0 
226 11.9 47.6 145.4 
9‡ 90 9.1 45 195.8 
10 124 14.5 68.4 0.0 
11 75 11.7 5.14 0.0 
12 143 14.4 38.6 0.0 
13* 113 7.7 36.8 354 
14 10 9.6 146.6 0.0 
15‡ 38.6 238 
16* 53 15.6 116.2 742 
17* 54 10 66.8 2080 
18* 71 8.3 101.2 4500 
19* 186 4.8 142 2200 

Samples were collected from HIV-positive patients beginning the national HAART regimen at the Infectious Disease Care Clinic in Gaborone, Botswana. All patients were antiretroviral drug–naive. CD34+ cells were isolated using a magnetic bead positive selection (Invitrogen). Patients with a CD34+ cell proviral load that was significantly higher than their respective PBMC proviral load are indicated *(t test, P < .005, ‡P < .05). Eight of 9 anemic patients (nos. 3, 6, 9, 13, 15, and 17-19) had positive CD34+ cell populations, a significantly higher portion than the 3 of 10 nonanemic patients (nos. 4, 5, and 16; Fisher exact test, P < .05).

Patients who had anemia (HGB ≤ 10 g/dL).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal