Table 1 Twelve cases of expert reviewer... | American Society of Hematology

Table 1

Twelve cases of expert reviewer disagreement in interim PET scans

Case no.	Concordant lesions, n	Discordant lesions, n	Reviewer 1	Reviewer 2	Reviewer 3	Consensus resolution
1	9	1 (PA)	0	+	0	N
2	0	1 (Bo)	0	+	+	N
3	5	1 (Sp)	0	0	+	N
4	5	1 (PA)	0	+	0	N
5	3	1 (PA)	0	+	0	N
6	7	1 (PA)	0	+	0	N
7	5	1 (Ce)	0	0	+	Y*
8	0	1 (Bo)	+	+	0	Y*
9	5	1 (IL)	0	+	0	N
10	15	1 (Sc)	0	+	+	Y†
11	3	1 (Sp)	+	0	+	N
12	1	1 (Bo)	0	+	+	N

Case no.	Concordant lesions, n	Discordant lesions, n	Reviewer 1	Reviewer 2	Reviewer 3	Consensus resolution
1	9	1 (PA)	0	+	0	N
2	0	1 (Bo)	0	+	+	N
3	5	1 (Sp)	0	0	+	N
4	5	1 (PA)	0	+	0	N
5	3	1 (PA)	0	+	0	N
6	7	1 (PA)	0	+	0	N
7	5	1 (Ce)	0	0	+	Y*
8	0	1 (Bo)	+	+	0	Y*
9	5	1 (IL)	0	+	0	N
10	15	1 (Sc)	0	+	+	Y†
11	3	1 (Sp)	+	0	+	N
12	1	1 (Bo)	0	+	+	N

0 indicates negative scan; +, positive scan; PA, para-aortic; Bo, bone; Sp, spleen; Ce, cervical; IL, iliac; and Sc, supraclavicular.

Consensus “negative.”

Consensus “positive.”