Table 1

Study population characteristics in the training set and validation set

CharacteristicTraining cohort, N = 282
P value for difference between GVHD and GVHD+Validation cohort, N = 142
P value for difference between GVHD and GVHD+P value for difference between training and validation sets
GVHD, N = 166GVHD+, N = 116GVHD, N = 76GVHD+, N = 66
Age, y        
    Median 43 49 .02 47 52 .17 .15 
    Range 1–68 1–71  4–69 1–66   
Diagnostic, % (no.)        
    Malignant* 93 (154) 97 (113) .15 97 (74) 97 (64) .71 .35 
    Other 7 (12) 3 (3)  3 (2) 3 (2)   
Disease status at BMT,% (no.)        
    Low risk 58 (96) 49 (57) .19 64 (49) 56 (37) .39 .14 
    High risk 42 (70) 51 (59)  36 (27) 44 (29)   
Donor type, % (no.)        
    MRD 68 (113) 58 (68) .13 75 (57) 58 (38) .04 .66 
    URD 32 (53) 42 (48)  25 (19) 42 (28)   
Donor match, % (no.)        
    Matched 95 (157) 87 (101) .04 93 (71) 83 (55) .10 .46 
    Mismatched 5 (9) 13 (15)  7 (5) 17 (11)   
Conditioning regimen intensity, % (no.)        
    Full 73 (122) 63 (73) .08 79 (60) 61 (41) .04 .76 
    Reduced 27 (44) 37 (43)  21 (16) 37 (25)   
Grade at GVHD onset, % (no.)        
    0 59 (166)  54 (76)   
    1 12 (34)  11 (15)  .31 
    2 23 (64)  24 (35)   
    3–4 6 (18)  11 (16)   
Organ target at GVHD onset, % (no.)        
    Skin 66 (71)  58 (38)   
    Gut 18 (20)  24 (16)  .64 
    Liver 4 (5)  4 (3)   
    Combined 12 (14)  14 (9)   
Day after BMT of samples        
    Median 30 30 .36 30 29 .85 .85 
    Range 7–104 5–119  7–99 7–112   
CharacteristicTraining cohort, N = 282
P value for difference between GVHD and GVHD+Validation cohort, N = 142
P value for difference between GVHD and GVHD+P value for difference between training and validation sets
GVHD, N = 166GVHD+, N = 116GVHD, N = 76GVHD+, N = 66
Age, y        
    Median 43 49 .02 47 52 .17 .15 
    Range 1–68 1–71  4–69 1–66   
Diagnostic, % (no.)        
    Malignant* 93 (154) 97 (113) .15 97 (74) 97 (64) .71 .35 
    Other 7 (12) 3 (3)  3 (2) 3 (2)   
Disease status at BMT,% (no.)        
    Low risk 58 (96) 49 (57) .19 64 (49) 56 (37) .39 .14 
    High risk 42 (70) 51 (59)  36 (27) 44 (29)   
Donor type, % (no.)        
    MRD 68 (113) 58 (68) .13 75 (57) 58 (38) .04 .66 
    URD 32 (53) 42 (48)  25 (19) 42 (28)   
Donor match, % (no.)        
    Matched 95 (157) 87 (101) .04 93 (71) 83 (55) .10 .46 
    Mismatched 5 (9) 13 (15)  7 (5) 17 (11)   
Conditioning regimen intensity, % (no.)        
    Full 73 (122) 63 (73) .08 79 (60) 61 (41) .04 .76 
    Reduced 27 (44) 37 (43)  21 (16) 37 (25)   
Grade at GVHD onset, % (no.)        
    0 59 (166)  54 (76)   
    1 12 (34)  11 (15)  .31 
    2 23 (64)  24 (35)   
    3–4 6 (18)  11 (16)   
Organ target at GVHD onset, % (no.)        
    Skin 66 (71)  58 (38)   
    Gut 18 (20)  24 (16)  .64 
    Liver 4 (5)  4 (3)   
    Combined 12 (14)  14 (9)   
Day after BMT of samples        
    Median 30 30 .36 30 29 .85 .85 
    Range 7–104 5–119  7–99 7–112   

GVHD indicates graft-versus-host disease.

*

Malignant disease included acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin disease (HD), multiple myeloma (MM), juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Nonmalignant disease included severe congenital neutropenia (SCN), severe aplastic anemia, Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, β-thalassemia, essential thrombocythemia, myelofibrosis, Glanzmann thrombasthenia, congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia, and sickle cell anemia.

Low and high risk of disease status at BMT according to IBMTR guidelines.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal