Table 2.

Response rates for initial therapy with FCM and R-FCM for patients with FLs and MCLs



All patients

Patients with FL

Patients with MCL

Rnd FCM
Rnd R-FCM
Add R-FCM
Rnd FCM
Rnd R-FCM
Add R-FCM
Rnd FCM
Rnd R-FCM
Add R-FCM
N   65   68   134   31   37   65   26   24   56  
CR, %   12   34   25   23   41   34   0   29   20  
PR, %   46   46   60   48   54   63   46   29   59  
MR/SD, %   12   6   6   13   0   2   4   13   5  
PD, %   25   12   5   16   3   2   38   29   11  
EX, %   5   3   3   0   3   0   12   0   5  
PR + CR, %
 
58
 
79
 
86
 
71
 
95
 
97
 
46
 
58
 
79
 


All patients

Patients with FL

Patients with MCL

Rnd FCM
Rnd R-FCM
Add R-FCM
Rnd FCM
Rnd R-FCM
Add R-FCM
Rnd FCM
Rnd R-FCM
Add R-FCM
N   65   68   134   31   37   65   26   24   56  
CR, %   12   34   25   23   41   34   0   29   20  
PR, %   46   46   60   48   54   63   46   29   59  
MR/SD, %   12   6   6   13   0   2   4   13   5  
PD, %   25   12   5   16   3   2   38   29   11  
EX, %   5   3   3   0   3   0   12   0   5  
PR + CR, %
 
58
 
79
 
86
 
71
 
95
 
97
 
46
 
58
 
79
 

For the randomized comparison of FCM versus R-FCM, R-FCM was superior in both lymphoma subtypes. In FL, the overall response rate (CR and PR) was 95% versus 71% (P = .01); in MCL, it was 58% versus 46% (P = .282). After the termination of the FCM arm all subsequent patients received R-FCM. The response rates from the first part of the study were unanimously confirmed.

Ran indicates randomized; Add, added; MR indicates minor response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; and EX, death.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal