Table 3.

RBC Pore Filterability Before and After HU Treatment

MPD MPD + HU Controls
RBCiv 3-μm (nL)  5.49 ± 1.37  16.10 ± 2.982 5.11 ± 0.57  
RBCcr 3-μm (—) 31.9 ± 4.3  37.6 ± 2.7  34.1 ± 2.8 
RBCiv 5-μm (nL)  0.857 ± 0.124 1.019 ± 0.148  0.691 ± 0.052  
RBCcr5-μm (—)  2.51 ± 0.41  1.61 ± 0.44 1.58 ± 0.24 
MPD MPD + HU Controls
RBCiv 3-μm (nL)  5.49 ± 1.37  16.10 ± 2.982 5.11 ± 0.57  
RBCcr 3-μm (—) 31.9 ± 4.3  37.6 ± 2.7  34.1 ± 2.8 
RBCiv 5-μm (nL)  0.857 ± 0.124 1.019 ± 0.148  0.691 ± 0.052  
RBCcr5-μm (—)  2.51 ± 0.41  1.61 ± 0.44 1.58 ± 0.24 

Patients with newly diagnosed MPD were analyzed before and after treatment with HU (n = 5). Healthy controls were studied in parallel (n = 5 + 5). Whole blood was centrifuged and washed three times with removal of plasma and white blood cells. The RBCs were resuspended in balanced KRH medium to 5% hematocrit. The RBC filterability was tested through both 3-μm and 5-μm Nucleopore membranes at 600 Pa constant pressure. From the measurements of initial filtration rate and clogging slope as a function of filtration time, the RBC incremental volume (RBCiv) and the RBC clogging rate (RBCcr) were calculated (see the Materials and Methods). Five levels of significances were tested: P < .051, P < .022, P < .013, P < .0054, and P < .0015. No significant differences were found between patients with MPD before treatment and controls.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal