Table 1.

Effect of Various Concentration Gradients of SN on Eosinophil Migration

SN [mol/L], Upper Chamber
Medium10−1110−910−7
 Medium 1.000 ± 0.000  1.059 ± 0.030  1.108 ± 0.052 1.149 ± 0.072* 
SN [mol/L], lower chamber 10−11 1.178 ± 0.076* 0.992 ± 0.049 1.098 ± 0.021  1.116 ± 0.056  
 10−9 1.332 ± 0.034 1.187 ± 0.047* 1.099 ± 0.037 1.119 ± 0.060  
 10−7 1.535 ± 0.018 1.383 ± 0.079 1.030 ± 0.059 1.110 ± 0.047 
SN [mol/L], Upper Chamber
Medium10−1110−910−7
 Medium 1.000 ± 0.000  1.059 ± 0.030  1.108 ± 0.052 1.149 ± 0.072* 
SN [mol/L], lower chamber 10−11 1.178 ± 0.076* 0.992 ± 0.049 1.098 ± 0.021  1.116 ± 0.056  
 10−9 1.332 ± 0.034 1.187 ± 0.047* 1.099 ± 0.037 1.119 ± 0.060  
 10−7 1.535 ± 0.018 1.383 ± 0.079 1.030 ± 0.059 1.110 ± 0.047 

Checkerboard analysis of eosinophil migration. Different concentrations of SN were added to the upper and/or lower compartment of chemotaxis chambers. RPMI 1640/0.5% BSA served as control medium. After a migration period of 60 minutes at 37°C (humidified atmosphere 5% CO2) the chemotaxis index of migration into the nitrocellulose filter was measured microscopically. “Chemotaxis Index” represents the ratio between the distance cells migrate toward test substances and that toward control medium (mean ± SEM, three independent experiments each performed in replicates of three). Statistical analysis: Mann-Whitney U-test: *P < .05; †P < .01 v medium in upper and lower chamber, ‡P < .01 v 0.1 μmol/L SN in upper and medium in lower chamber.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal