Table 1.

Induction of Spontaneous Monocytic Differentiation in M1 Cells Transfected With WT1 +KTS Isoforms

Cell Type M1 (%) M1.Neo (%) M1.WT1.1 (+/+) (%)M1.WT1.2 (−/+) (%) M1.WT1.3 (+/−) (%)M1.WT1.4 (−/−) (%)
Monoblast  100  98  42 41  92  83  
Promonocyte  0  2  26  33  15  
Monocyte  0  0  30  18  2  
Macrophage  0  0  2  8  0  
Cell Type M1 (%) M1.Neo (%) M1.WT1.1 (+/+) (%)M1.WT1.2 (−/+) (%) M1.WT1.3 (+/−) (%)M1.WT1.4 (−/−) (%)
Monoblast  100  98  42 41  92  83  
Promonocyte  0  2  26  33  15  
Monocyte  0  0  30  18  2  
Macrophage  0  0  2  8  0  

M1 cells stably transfected with retroviral vectors containing cDNAs encoding the individual WT1 isoforms were compared to parental cells or control M1.Neo cells generated by transfection with a retroviral vector encoding neomycin-resistance. Morphological differentiation was enumerated by Leishman's staining of cytospin preparations and scoring the proportion of immature blast cells to cells at intermediate monocytic and mature macrophage stages of differentiation.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal