Table 1.

Comparison of IPSS and M.D. Anderson Patients

IPSSM.D. AndersonP Value
Patients 816 219 
Median age* 69 65 
RA/RAS (%) 51 45 .08 
RAEB (%) 26 28 .41 
RAEB-t (%) 24 <.001 
CMML (%) 15 <.001 
Median platelet count/neutrophil count/hemoglobin >100/>1.5 72/0.9/9.6 
2-3 Cytopenias (%) 42 66 <.001 
Cyto good (%) 70 55 <.001 
Cyto inter (%) 14 17 .23 
Cyto poor (%) 16 28 <.001 
IPSS score 
Low (%) 33 13 <.001 
INT-1 (%) 38 41 .56 
INT-2 (%) 22 30 .008 
High (%) 16 <.001 
IPSSM.D. AndersonP Value
Patients 816 219 
Median age* 69 65 
RA/RAS (%) 51 45 .08 
RAEB (%) 26 28 .41 
RAEB-t (%) 24 <.001 
CMML (%) 15 <.001 
Median platelet count/neutrophil count/hemoglobin >100/>1.5 72/0.9/9.6 
2-3 Cytopenias (%) 42 66 <.001 
Cyto good (%) 70 55 <.001 
Cyto inter (%) 14 17 .23 
Cyto poor (%) 16 28 <.001 
IPSS score 
Low (%) 33 13 <.001 
INT-1 (%) 38 41 .56 
INT-2 (%) 22 30 .008 
High (%) 16 <.001 
*

% of patients age >60 years 75% v 65% in the IPSS and MDA groups, respectively (P = .005).

% of patients with platelet count < 100 37% v 63% in the IPSS and MDA groups, respectively (P < .001). % of patients with neutrophil count <1.5 46% v 65% in the IPSS and MDA groups, respectively (P <.001). % of patients with Hg <10 54% v 60% in the IPSS and MDA groups, respectively (P = .11).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal