Table 4.

Change in Mean Anti-HIV CTL Activity After the Infusion

Baseline4-1501 wk24 wk
Anti-gp 1604-151 16 ± 9 21 ± 11 20 ± 11 
  P = .47 P = .40 
Anti-RT 8 ± 5 13 ± 17 15 ± 7 
  P = .49 P = .05 
Anti-gag 18 ± 9 26 ± 7 23 ± 12 
  P = .10 P = .17 
Sum of HIV-specific cytotoxicity 42 ± 15 60 ± 23 58 ± 20 
  P = .33 P = .06 
Baseline4-1501 wk24 wk
Anti-gp 1604-151 16 ± 9 21 ± 11 20 ± 11 
  P = .47 P = .40 
Anti-RT 8 ± 5 13 ± 17 15 ± 7 
  P = .49 P = .05 
Anti-gag 18 ± 9 26 ± 7 23 ± 12 
  P = .10 P = .17 
Sum of HIV-specific cytotoxicity 42 ± 15 60 ± 23 58 ± 20 
  P = .33 P = .06 

Four of six subjects' T-cell lines were expanded in the presence of gag peptides, three were expanded with gp 160 peptides and none were expanded with RT peptides. The anti-HIV CTL activity is defined as the difference between the percentage of specific cytotoxicity against an autologous HIV-expressing target and a lacZ-expressing control target at an E:T ratio of 25:1. The sum of HIV-specific cytotoxicity is the sum of the anti-gp 160, RT, and gag values.

This table gives cross-sectional means and standard deviations for each time point. One subject (226) was missing all week-1 CTL evaluations. The P values give the significance levels for paired comparisons from baseline to the given time point.

F4-150

The biologic and assay variability, calculated by comparing the two assays on each subject performed before the infusion, was 4% for anti-gp 160–, 3% for anti-RT–, and 5% for anti-gag–specific cytotoxicity.

F4-151

If only subjects receiving T cells enhanced for anti-gp 160 cytotoxicity are analyzed (subjects 202, 204, and 214), anti-gp 160 cytotoxicity was 23% ± 8% at baseline, 28% ± 7% at week 1, and 28% ± 10% at week 24.

If only subjects receiving T cells enhanced for gag cytotoxicity are analyzed (subjects 204, 216, 203, and 214), anti-gag cytotoxicity was 24% ± 5% at baseline, 28% ± 7% at week 1, and 28% ± 11% at week 24.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal